Pressurized Wastewater Pump Control for Self-Cleaning Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pressurized drainage systems face issues with clogging due to uneven flow rates, leading to increased maintenance costs, as they are often over-dimensioned to handle peak inflows, resulting in insufficient flow rates during non-peak hours.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a centrally controlled activation method for pump stations, where pump stations transmit their standby status to a central controller, forming groups to ensure a minimum flow rate of 0.7 m/s by activating a predetermined number of pump stations simultaneously, thereby maintaining self-cleaning of the lines and reducing clogging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the drainage system is over-dimensioned to handle peak inflows, then the system capacity is sufficient for maximum demand, but the flow rate becomes insufficient during non-peak hours leading to clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidflow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active pump stations based on real-time flow demand. During peak hours, more pump stations are activated to maintain adequate flow rates in over-dimensioned pipes. During non-peak hours, fewer pump stations operate, matching the reduced inflow and maintaining self-cleaning velocities. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between having sufficient capacity for peak demand while maintaining adequate flow rates during low-demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (number of active pump stations) based on varying inflow conditions. By monitoring flow rates and adjusting pump station activation accordingly, the system maintains optimal flow velocities in pipes of fixed diameter, preventing clogging during non-peak hours while ensuring sufficient capacity during peak inflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If pump stations are activated based on decentralized water level control, then the system is simple to operate, but the flow rate remains uneven and insufficient to prevent clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidclogging prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring flow rates in the drainage lines and using this information to adjust pump station activation. Flow rate sensors provide real-time data to a central controller, which then activates or deactivates pump stations to maintain flow rates above the self-cleaning threshold. This feedback mechanism maintains control simplicity while reliably preventing clogging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A central controller acts as an intermediary between the decentralized pump stations and the flow rate requirements. The controller receives flow rate information, processes it according to pre-defined criteria, and sends activation commands to appropriate pump stations. This intermediary enables coordinated operation that prevents clogging while maintaining ease of operation through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a minimum flow rate of 0.7 m/s is maintained in the pipes, then self-cleaning and clogging prevention are achieved, but more pump stations must be activated simultaneously increasing energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclogging preventionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates only the necessary number of pump stations required to achieve the minimum self-cleaning flow rate of 0.7 m/s, rather than operating all pump stations continuously or during all high-demand periods. By calculating the precise number of pump stations needed based on real-time flow conditions, the system achieves adequate clogging prevention while minimizing energy consumption through partial action rather than excessive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures a consistent minimum flow rate, reducing clogging and maintenance costs by optimizing the operation of pump stations based on actual demand, rather than peak capacity, thereby enhancing the efficiency and reliability of the drainage system.

Implementation Method 1

pressurized drainage system having interconnected line sections for conducting wastewater to a transfer station and respective pump stations connected to the line sections for collecting the wastewater

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10519948B2Method of operating a pressurized drainage system for wastewater
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 WILO SE
  • US10519948B2 patent drawing
  • US10519948B2 patent drawing
  • US10519948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of operating a pressurized wastewater-drainage system (1) having interconnected line sections (SA1 . . . SA9) for conducting wastewater to a transfer station (10) and a plurality of pump stations (2) connected to the line sections (SA1 . . . SA9) for collecting the wastewater, wherein at least a portion of the pump stations (2) transmits at least status information indicating its respective pump standby status to a central controller (3), wherein a group is formed from the set of pump stations (2) that are in pump standby in relation to one of the line sections (SA1 . . . SA9) such that the number of pump stations (2) of the group corresponds at least to a minimum number (p_min) of pump stations (2) associated with this line section (SA1 . . . SA9), and the pump station (2) or pump stations (2) of the group are then activated simultaneously by the central controller (3). A minimum flow rate is thus present in wide portions of the pressurized drainage system and for a maximum time, which results in a cleaning effect and thus reduces the danger of clogging.