Wastewater Treatment Control Using Dynamic SO and SNO Set-Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) face challenges in balancing optimization objectives for dissolved oxygen (SO) and nitrate nitrogen (SNO) to ensure efficient energy consumption and effluent quality, as existing methods struggle with dynamic operation conditions and influent flow rate variations.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization (DMOPSO) algorithm is implemented to optimize SO and SNO levels, coupled with a multivariable PID controller to adjust aeration and reflow pump operations based on real-time data, ensuring optimal control of WWTP processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional control methods are used to maintain effluent quality, then effluent quality standards are met, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffluent qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic set-point adjustment for dissolved oxygen and nitrate nitrogen control based on real-time influent conditions. The control system transitions from fixed set-points to time-varying optimal set-points that adapt to changing operational conditions, reducing aeration energy consumption while maintaining effluent quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization algorithm dynamically adjusts control parameters (dissolved oxygen set-point, nitrate nitrogen set-point) based on influent flow rate and quality variations. By changing these parameters adaptively rather than maintaining fixed values, the system achieves energy savings while meeting effluent requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If fixed set-points are used for dissolved oxygen and nitrate nitrogen, then control simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to varying influent conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to influent variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates real-time monitoring of influent flow rate, dissolved oxygen, and nitrate nitrogen levels, using this feedback to dynamically adjust control set-points. The optimization algorithm continuously receives process data and adjusts parameters to maintain optimal performance under varying conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs predictive optimization by anticipating changes in influent conditions and adjusting control set-points in advance. The dynamic optimization algorithm calculates optimal set-points based on predicted operational scenarios, allowing the system to proactively adapt rather than reactively respond to changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If aeration energy is increased to improve effluent quality, then treatment effectiveness improves, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidaeration energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the dissolved oxygen set-point parameter dynamically based on influent conditions and treatment requirements. By adjusting this critical parameter rather than maintaining constant high levels, the system achieves effective treatment with reduced aeration energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization algorithm determines the minimum necessary aeration levels required to meet effluent quality standards rather than applying excessive aeration. This partial action approach avoids unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining adequate treatment effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230259075A1Dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization-based optimal control method for wastewater treatment process
Publication Date: 2023.08.17 BEIJING UNIV OF TECH
  • US20230259075A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259075A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259075A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization based optimal control method is provided to realize the control of dissolved oxygen (SO) and the nitrate nitrogen (SNO) in wastewater treatment process. In this method, dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization was used to optimize the operation objectives of WWTP, and the optimal solutions of SO and SNO can be calculated. Then PID controller was introduced to trace the dynamic optimal solutions of SO and SNO. The results demonstrated that the proposed optimal control strategy can address the dynamic optimal control problem, and guarantee the efficient and stable operation. In addition, this proposed optimal control method in this present invention can guarantee the effluent qualities and reduce the energy consumption.