Cleaning device and cleaning system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cleaning devices, such as floor scrubbers, require frequent user intervention to check the water level in the wastewater tank to avoid overflow and lack convenient detection of proper tank assembly, leading to poor user experience.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of a first sensing assembly with two symmetrical floats in the wastewater tank, allowing for real-time detection of water level and tank assembly status, using induction signals to alert the user when the tank is full or improperly assembled, and a filter mesh pouch for efficient wastewater filtration during dumping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a water level detection system is added to the wastewater tank, then overflow risk is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverflow preventionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electronic water level detection systems with a simple magnetic float mechanism. The float contains a magnet that interacts with a Hall sensor, providing reliable water level detection through magnetic field interaction rather than complex electrical circuits. This mechanical-magnetic approach maintains reliability while minimizing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The wastewater tank system performs self-detection of its own water level through the integrated float mechanism. The float automatically rises and falls with water level changes, triggering detection without requiring external monitoring systems. The tank essentially detects itself, reducing the need for additional complex detection infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If assembly status detection is implemented, then improper assembly is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly correctnessVSAvoiddetection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines water level detection and assembly status detection into a single integrated float mechanism. The same float that detects water level also indicates assembly status through its position relative to the tank body. This merging of functions eliminates the need for separate detection systems, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliable detection of both parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The float mechanism serves multiple functions: it detects water level, indicates assembly status, and provides visual feedback to the user. This multi-functional design allows a single component to perform what would traditionally require multiple separate systems, thereby reducing device complexity while improving reliability through comprehensive monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If manual water level checking is required, then device complexity is reduced, but user convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automatic feedback through the float mechanism that provides real-time information about water level and assembly status. The float's position gives immediate visual feedback to the user, eliminating the need for manual checking. This automatic feedback system maintains simple device architecture while dramatically improving ease of operation by keeping users informed without requiring their active involvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If filtration system is added during dumping, then filtration efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiencyVSAvoidfiltration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the filtration function from the main device body and places it in a removable filter bag that is easily attached and detached. This extraction allows the filtration system to be added only when needed during the dumping process, rather than being a permanent integrated component. The result is improved filtration efficiency without permanently increasing device complexity, as the filtration element can be removed when not in use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances user convenience by automatically detecting water level and assembly status, reducing the risk of overflow and improving filtration efficiency, thereby simplifying operation and maintaining device performance.

Implementation Method 1

a first float and a second float, which are disposed in the wastewater tank body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS20250386991A1Cleaning device and cleaning system
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 BEIJING ROCKROBO TECH CO LTD
  • US20250386991A1 patent drawing
  • US20250386991A1 patent drawing
  • US20250386991A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cleaning device and a cleaning system. The cleaning device includes a cleaning base body and a device body which are pivotally connected. The device body includes a first sensing assembly and a sewage tank. The sewage tank is detachably connected to the device body. The sewage tank comprises a sewage tank body, a first floater and a second floater, the first floater and the second floater being arranged in the sewage tank body.