Water-Absorbent Polymer Particle Production via Steam-Zoned Fluidized Bed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing processes for producing water-absorbent polymer particles by dropletization polymerization face challenges such as the formation of undesired lumps, high steam consumption, and residual monomers, which affect the quality and efficiency of the polymerization process.

Innovation Solution

A process involving polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution in a heated gas phase within a reactor with a gas distributor, reaction zone, and fluidized bed, where the gas is treated in a condenser column and recycled, maintaining a steam content of 0.05 to 0.3 kg steam per kg dry gas, and ensuring the steam content in the reaction zone is less than that in the fluidized bed, to optimize the polymerization conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high steam content is used in the reaction zone, then residual monomers are reduced, but lumps and undesired overs are formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle roundnessVSAvoidlump formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by maintaining different steam contents in different zones: low steam content (0.01-0.1 kg/kg) in the reaction zone to prevent lump formation, and high steam content (0.5-2.0 kg/kg) in the fluidized bed to reduce residual monomers. This spatial differentiation resolves the contradiction between particle quality and harmful byproducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the gas flow path into distinct zones with different steam content requirements. The gas stream is separated into a reaction zone portion (low steam) and a fluidized bed portion (high steam), allowing each zone to operate under optimal conditions for its specific function without interfering with the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If high steam content is used in the fluidized bed, then residual monomers are reduced, but steam consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual monomer contentVSAvoidsteam consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by recycling the gas stream from the fluidized bed back to the reaction zone, creating a closed-loop system. This allows the high-steam fluidized bed to operate efficiently for monomer removal while the recycled gas provides the necessary steam to the reaction zone without requiring additional external steam input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent recovers and reuses the gas stream containing steam and unreacted monomers from the fluidized bed, directing it back to the reaction zone. This recovery approach eliminates waste steam and reduces overall energy consumption while maintaining the high steam content needed for effective monomer removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Object-generated harmful factors

If low steam content is used in the reaction zone, then lump formation is prevented, but residual monomers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelump formationVSAvoidresidual monomer content
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the gas flow into distinct portions with different steam contents: low steam content (0.01-0.1 kg/kg) in the reaction zone to prevent lump formation during polymerization, and high steam content (0.5-2.0 kg/kg) in the fluidized bed to reduce residual monomers. This segmentation allows each function to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the fluidized bed as an intermediary zone between the reaction zone and the product discharge. The fluidized bed receives gas with low steam content from the reaction zone, adds steam through water injection, and then delivers high-steam gas to reduce residual monomers in the polymer particles without affecting the lump-free polymerization that occurred in the reaction zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the formation of lumps and residual monomers, enhances the roundness and quality of water-absorbent polymer particles, and minimizes steam consumption, resulting in improved product characteristics and process efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution in a surrounding heated gas phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

the gas leaving the reactor is treated in a condenser column (12) with an aqueous solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

a fluidized bed (27)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Data Source

PatentUS9914112B2Process for producing water-absorbent polymer particles by polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 BASF SE
  • US9914112B2 patent drawing
  • US9914112B2 patent drawing
  • US9914112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for producing water-absorbent polymer particles by polymerizing droplets of a monomer solution in a surrounding heated gas phase in a reactor comprising a gas distributor (3), a reaction zone (5) and a fluidized bed (27), the gas leaving the reactor is treated in a condenser column (12) with an aqueous solution, the treated gas leaving the condenser column (12) is recycled at least partly to the fluidized bed (27), wherein the gas leaving the condenser column (12) comprises from 0.05 to 0.3 kg steam per kg dry gas and the steam content of the gas entering the gas distributor (3) is less than 80% of the steam content of the gas leaving the condenser column (12).