Adjustable Water-Brake Rails for Consistent Ride Deceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional water rides face inefficiencies due to constant braking force in the run-out section, leading to uneven deceleration rates for vehicles of varying weights, causing operational challenges such as vehicle-to-vehicle bumping and reduced ride quality.

Innovation Solution

The run-out section is designed to adjust the height of its rails based on vehicle weight, varying the water depth and thus the braking force to ensure proportional drag for vehicles of different weights, using either passive spring members or active actuatable components to maintain consistent deceleration rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If constant braking force is used in the run-out section, then the structure is simple and easy to operate, but vehicles of different weights experience uneven deceleration rates causing operational challenges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking system operationVSAvoidvehicle spacing control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The run-out section transitions from a static, fixed-geometry structure to a dynamic system where the water depth is actively adjusted based on vehicle weight. Weight sensors detect the vehicle mass, and actuators modify the rail height to vary water depth, creating a braking force that adapts to each vehicle's weight for consistent deceleration rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical parameter of water depth in the run-out section based on vehicle weight. By adjusting the rail height through actuators, the water depth parameter is modified to proportionally increase braking force for heavier vehicles, ensuring uniform deceleration across different vehicle masses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If water depth is increased to provide stronger braking, then deceleration rate improves, but lighter vehicles are over-braked and stopped too quickly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeceleration rateVSAvoidride capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the water depth parameter based on detected vehicle weight. Lighter vehicles encounter shallower water depth resulting in reduced braking force, while heavier vehicles experience deeper water depth and proportionally stronger braking, optimizing deceleration for each case without over-braking light vehicles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Weight sensors provide feedback on vehicle mass before the vehicle enters the run-out section. This weight information is used by the control system to pre-adjust the water depth via actuators, creating a closed-loop system that optimizes braking performance and maintains ride capacity by preventing unnecessary stops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If rail height is adjusted proportionally to vehicle weight, then deceleration rates become consistent, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeceleration consistencyVSAvoidrun-out section structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The run-out section incorporates dynamic elements including adjustable rails mounted on actuators and weight sensors. These components enable the system to automatically adapt to different vehicle weights by modifying rail height and water depth, achieving consistent deceleration despite the increased structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses weight sensors to automatically detect vehicle mass and triggers actuators to self-adjust the rail height and water depth accordingly. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual intervention or complex control systems, achieving proportional braking through automated feedback-based adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures that all vehicles, regardless of weight, are slowed at a similar rate and distance, improving ride efficiency and reducing the likelihood of vehicle-to-vehicle collisions, thereby enhancing the overall ride experience and capacity.

Implementation Method 1

the track in the run-out section runs through a chute or pool of water at a depth that causes at least a portion of a vehicle riding on the rails to contact a depth of the water to cause vehicle braking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

The adjusting means may include a plurality of spring members disposed between vertical track supports in the pool and the at least one rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11338212B2Park ride with weight proportional water braking
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC
  • US11338212B2 patent drawing
  • US11338212B2 patent drawing
  • US11338212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A water ride including vehicles that ride on a track and using water for braking. A run-out section of the track is provided after a drop or down chute section, and the track in the run-out section runs through a pool of water at a depth causing at least a portion of a vehicle riding on the rails to contact a depth of the water to achieve vehicle braking. Significantly, the new water ride is adapted to adjust or set a variable height of the rails in the run-out chute or pool to adjust the depth of water providing water drag on a vehicle traveling through the run-out section based on the vehicle weight. A braking force is applied by the water that is proportional to vehicle weight, and the water ride may be thought of as slowing vehicles with a range of weights at about the same deceleration rate.