Point-of-Use Water Flow Control for Utility Demand Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Water utilities face challenges in dynamically managing water consumption to reduce electrical energy usage, as they lack point-of-use control capabilities to respond effectively to electrical demand response signals, limiting their ability to reduce energy consumption beyond scheduling changes in pumping.

Innovation Solution

A water management system with a demand response controller that receives signals to reduce electrical power consumption, selects point-of-use devices for flow reduction or shut-off, and transmits control signals to implement and terminate demand response conditions dynamically, incorporating machine learning and artificial intelligence for autonomous adjustments and compliance with regulatory restrictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If water utilities use traditional pumping scheduling changes to reduce energy consumption, then some energy reduction is achieved, but the reduction is limited and cannot respond dynamically to electrical demand response signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical energy consumptionVSAvoiddynamic response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the water distribution system into multiple controllable zones with individual demand response controllers and point-of-use devices. This segmentation enables independent control of water flow in different regions, allowing dynamic response to electrical demand signals by adjusting flow in specific zones rather than system-wide pumping schedule changes, thereby achieving both energy reduction and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic control through demand response controllers that receive real-time electrical demand response signals and automatically adjust water flow parameters. The point-of-use devices dynamically modify flow rates based on received control signals, enabling the system to adapt quickly to changing electrical conditions without relying on static pumping schedules, thus resolving the contradiction between energy reduction and dynamic response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If point-of-use flow control is implemented to achieve significant energy reduction, then energy consumption decreases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepumping energy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The demand response controllers and point-of-use devices are designed with multi-functionality, serving both as flow control mechanisms and as communication nodes in the network. These devices can perform multiple functions including receiving control signals, processing demand response logic, adjusting flow rates, and providing feedback, thereby reducing the need for separate dedicated components and mitigating system complexity despite the distributed control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through autonomous demand response controllers that automatically process electrical demand signals and adjust water flow without requiring manual intervention or complex centralized control. The point-of-use devices autonomously execute flow adjustments based on received signals, reducing the operational complexity and eliminating the need for extensive human monitoring and management of the distributed control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional water utility operations are maintained, then operational simplicity is preserved, but the ability to respond to electrical demand management signals is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand response capabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where demand response controllers continuously monitor electrical demand response signals and adjust water flow parameters accordingly. The point-of-use devices provide feedback on actual flow conditions, enabling automatic closed-loop control that enhances demand response capability while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making algorithms that eliminate the need for complex manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240345606A1Water Utility Demand Management for Reduction of Electrical Energy Consumption
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 AQUANA LLC
  • US20240345606A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345606A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345606A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A water management system includes a demand response controller. The demand response controller configured to receive a demand response signal that specifies a reduction in electrical power consumption by a water utility. The demand response controller is also configured to select a point of use device (PUD) to implement a reduction in water consumption responsive to the demand response signal. The demand response controller is further configured to transmit, to the PUD, a control signal that specifies a reduction in water flow controlled by the PUD.