Water Heater Load Control for Peak Demand Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy management systems for household appliances lack effective peak demand reduction methods, relying on simple on/off switching and failing to communicate efficiently with utilities, leading to high energy consumption during peak hours and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A modular energy management system that includes a controller and communication module, utilizing ambient light sensors, timers, and RFID tags to determine peak demand periods and adjust appliance operations, such as water heaters and refrigerators, to reduce energy consumption through setpoint temperature adjustments and load shedding, while enabling communication with various utility protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple on/off switching is used to control energy supply during peak demand, then device complexity is reduced, but energy consumption during peak hours remains high and peak demand reduction is ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidenergy consumption during peak hours
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts appliance operation based on real-time utility pricing signals and demand conditions. Instead of static on/off switching, the controller continuously monitors utility state and adjusts power consumption levels, enabling active load management that responds to changing energy costs and grid conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as temperature setpoints, cycle durations, and power levels based on utility pricing signals. For example, water heaters adjust temperature setpoints during peak demand, and refrigerators modify compressor run times, allowing flexible energy management that goes beyond simple binary switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If active control and load management features are added to appliances, then energy consumption during peak hours is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption during peak hoursVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The utility company acts as an intermediary by providing standardized pricing signals and demand information to appliances. This mediator approach allows complex energy management without requiring each appliance to independently analyze grid conditions, as the utility translates complex system state into simple actionable signals that appliances can execute.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed to handle multiple functions including peak demand reduction, energy cost optimization, and load management through a single integrated controller. The same controller that manages basic appliance operations also handles utility signal reception, interpretation, and responsive control, consolidating complexity rather than adding separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If standardized communication protocols are implemented for utility-appliance communication, then adaptability to different utility companies is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different utility protocolsVSAvoidcommunication module complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication module is designed with universal functionality to handle multiple utility protocols and communication methods. A single module can interface with different utility companies using various protocols, eliminating the need for appliance-specific custom communication hardware for each utility provider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized communication protocol acts as an intermediary language between diverse utility systems and appliances. By establishing common communication standards, the system enables seamless interaction without requiring complex custom integration for each utility-appliance pair, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8367984B2Energy management of household appliances
Publication Date: 2013.02.05 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8367984B2 patent drawing
  • US8367984B2 patent drawing
  • US8367984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A water heater comprises a body defining a chamber for holding water to be heated, an inlet opening and an outlet opening in communication with the chamber for flowing water therethrough and one or more power consuming features/functions including a heater for heating the water within the chamber. A controller is operatively connected to the one or more power consuming features/functions. The controller is configured to receive and process a signal indicative of a utility state. The controller operates the water heater in one of a plurality of operating modes, including at least a normal operating mode and an energy savings mode, in response to the received signal. The controller is configured to at least one of selectively adjust and deactivate at least one of the one or more power consuming features/functions to reduce power consumption of the water heater in the energy savings mode.