Water Injection Timing for Engine Knock and Torque Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine control methods for alcohol-fueled engines, such as those using water injection to address engine knocking, often result in unexpected torque variations due to varying cylinder temperatures at the time of injection, leading to inconsistent engine performance.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting the timing and amount of direct water injection based on engine operating conditions, knock intensity, and desired dilution, with throttle adjustments to compensate for torque variations, and using multiple injections of knock control fluid before intake valve closing to mitigate knock and maintain desired torque.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If water injection timing is adjusted to address engine knocking, then knock intensity is reduced, but torque variations occur due to changing cylinder temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine knockVSAvoidtorque consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors cylinder temperature and knock intensity, then adjusts water injection timing and throttle position in real-time to maintain optimal engine performance while addressing knock conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes injection timing parameters and throttle position based on detected knock intensity and cylinder temperature conditions, optimizing the balance between knock control and torque consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If water injection amount is increased to reduce NOx emissions, then emissions are improved, but engine torque is reduced due to charge displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx emissionsVSAvoidengine torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts water injection amount based on real-time engine operating conditions, throttle position, and knock detection, optimizing the balance between emissions control and power output

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system varies injection quantity parameters according to engine load, speed, and emissions requirements, maintaining optimal torque while achieving desired NOx reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple water injections are performed before intake valve closing to mitigate knock, then knock control is improved, but torque variations increase due to vaporization effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine knockVSAvoidtorque consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The water injection process is divided into multiple staged injections before intake valve closing, with each injection carefully controlled to provide knock mitigation while minimizing torque variations through progressive charge cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors knock intensity and cylinder temperature during multiple injections, adjusting subsequent injection timing and quantity based on real-time feedback to maintain torque consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively addresses torque variations and improves engine performance by optimizing the timing and amount of water injection and throttle adjustments, ensuring consistent engine operation and reduced NOx emissions.

Implementation Method 1

The cooling and dilution effects of the injected water may be used to address cylinder knock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

the injected water may vaporize more, leading to more displacement of air-fuel charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

The cooling and dilution effects of the injected water may be used to address cylinder knock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDilution:

Data Source

PatentUS8755989B2Method and system for controlling fuel usage
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8755989B2 patent drawing
  • US8755989B2 patent drawing
  • US8755989B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for improving fuel usage while addressing knock by adjusting the use of spark retard and direct injection of a fluid based on engine operating conditions and the composition of the injected fluid. One or more engine parameters, such as EGR, VCT, boost, throttle position, are coordinated with the direct injection to reduce torque and EGR transients.