Interactive Water System Sampling Sequence With User Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of sampling and disinfection in medical water systems is time-consuming and not user-friendly due to the lack of efficient coordination among hospital staff, service engineers, and external laboratories.

Innovation Solution

A device with a user interface and controlling unit that uses historical data to create an execution sequence for sampling and disinfection, allowing user feedback to adjust the sequence, and provides interactive support through task recommendations and updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual coordination among hospital staff, service engineers, and external laboratories is used for sampling and disinfection, then flexibility in task assignment is maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of sampling and disinfection processVSAvoidtime required for coordination and execution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where users provide feedback on tasks through the user interface, and the controlling unit automatically adjusts the execution sequence based on this feedback. This enables dynamic adaptation of the sampling and disinfection process, improving efficiency by eliminating manual re-planning while maintaining flexibility through automated response to actual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The device performs self-planning by automatically creating and adjusting execution sequences based on historical data and user feedback. The controlling unit independently manages task coordination between hospital staff, service engineers, and laboratories without requiring manual intervention, thus improving productivity while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated execution sequences are implemented for sampling and disinfection, then process efficiency is improved, but user-friendliness may deteriorate due to reduced manual control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation level of sampling and disinfectionVSAvoiduser-friendliness of the system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains user-friendliness by providing an intuitive user interface that allows users to easily provide feedback on tasks. The controlling unit processes this feedback and automatically adjusts the execution sequence, giving users a sense of control while benefiting from automated optimization. This feedback mechanism bridges automation with user engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The execution sequence is dynamically adjusted based on user feedback rather than being rigidly fixed. The controlling unit continuously adapts the plan to reflect actual conditions and user input, making the automated system feel more responsive and user-friendly while maintaining high productivity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If historical data is used to automatically create execution sequences, then planning accuracy is improved, but the device complexity increases due to database management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of execution sequence planningVSAvoidcomplexity of data management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controlling unit serves multiple functions: it manages the database, creates execution sequences, processes user feedback, and adjusts plans automatically. By consolidating these functions in a single multi-functional unit, the system achieves accurate data-driven planning without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-planning by automatically creating execution sequences based on historical data without requiring external planning tools or complex manual data management. The controlling unit independently handles data retrieval, analysis, and sequence generation, improving planning accuracy while keeping the device architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the device operates in read-only mode regarding system settings, then system safety and integrity are maintained, but the device functionality is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity of system settingsVSAvoiddevice configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device operates in read-only mode for system settings to maintain integrity, but compensates by implementing feedback loops for execution sequence adjustments. Users can provide feedback on task completion and conditions, and the controlling unit adjusts the execution sequence accordingly, providing adaptability without compromising the integrity of core system settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250342949A1Device and method for interactively performing sampling and/or disinfection
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  • US20250342949A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342949A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342949A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a device for interactively carrying out sampling and/or disinfection of a system, more particularly a water technology system, wherein the device has a user interface and a controlling unit which is programmed to identify the system, to load, from a database, historical data relating to at least one operating process of the system and to automatically create, on the basis of the historical data, a execution sequence for future sampling and/or disinfection of the system, wherein the execution sequence contains at least one specific task for a user, which task is communicated to the user at at least one predefined time, wherein the user is asked, by means of the user interface, to enter a feedback regarding the at least one specific task and/or the completion thereof by the user, following which the controlling unit independently adjusts and/or updates the execution sequence for sampling and/or disinfection on the basis of the feedback of the user.