Watercraft Fish Bite Control System
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Fishing can be challenging due to the chaotic nature of a fish bite, making it difficult for anglers to manually adjust watercraft parameters like speed and direction quickly enough to land a fish, especially when multiple users are involved.
Innovation Solution
A system and method for automatically controlling a watercraft in response to a fish bite, using a processor and memory to execute pre-programmed 'fish-on' operations that alter speed, direction, and other parameters to aid in catching and reeling in the fish, which can include notifying other watercrafts and engaging an autopilot for navigation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual adjustment of watercraft parameters is used during a fish bite, then the user can control the watercraft, but the response time is too slow and the fish may be released
Solution Approach 1:
The system pre-configures optimal watercraft parameters (speed, direction, rate of change) for different fish types before fishing operations begin. When a fish bite is detected, the system executes the pre-configured parameters immediately without requiring manual adjustment, thus eliminating response time delay while ensuring reliable fish landing.
2Loss of time
If automated fish-on operations are implemented, then the response time is reduced, but the system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system reduces complexity by pre-configuring all necessary parameters (speed, direction, rate of change) before fishing operations. The processor simply executes these pre-set parameters when a bite is detected, avoiding the need for complex real-time calculations or manual interventions during the critical response period.
Solution Approach 2:
The system enables the watercraft to automatically adjust its own parameters through the processor executing pre-configured fish-on operations. The watercraft self-regulates speed, direction, and other parameters without external human intervention, simplifying the control architecture while maintaining rapid response capability.
3Productivity
If multiple users are on the watercraft, then fishing capacity increases, but communication and coordination become difficult during a fish bite
Solution Approach 1:
The automated system eliminates the need for human coordination during fish bites by having the processor automatically execute pre-configured parameters. Each user can focus on their fishing line independently, and the system handles all watercraft control adjustments automatically, making the operation as easy as a single-user scenario while maintaining multi-user fishing capacity.
Data Source
AI summary
Example systems and methods are provided herein for controlling a watercraft in response to a bite on a fishing line. A system includes a memory and a processor, and the processor is configured to receive data via user input or one or more sensors to determine whether a fish has bitten on a fishing line. In response to a determination that the fish has bitten on the fishing line, the processor causes the watercraft to operate according to a fish-on operation, which includes at least one of altering a speed of the watercraft, altering a direction of the watercraft, altering a rate of change of the speed of the watercraft, altering a direction of a trolling motor, notifying other watercrafts, or engaging an autopilot to navigate the watercraft according to a preset route. The fish-on operation is designed to aid a user in catching the fish.