Waterjet Cutting Path Control for Taper and Trailback Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-axis CNC machines for waterjet cutting systems struggle with manual adjustments to compensate for cutting characteristics like taper and trailback, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal cut quality due to variations in process parameters.

Innovation Solution

An Adaptive Vector Control System (AVCS) that autonomously adjusts the cutting path and orientation of the waterjet in real-time using sensors and predictive models to compensate for variations in process parameters, ensuring precise control over the cutting process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional five-axis systems are used to manually adjust cutting head orientation to compensate for taper and trailback, then cut quality can be improved, but system complexity and operational time increase due to manual trial and error adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors operational parameters (pressure, flow rate, speed) and automatically adjusts cutting head orientation to compensate for taper and trailback effects. The control system performs real-time calculations and modifies motion programs without requiring manual intervention, allowing the system to self-correct cutting quality issues as they arise during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operational parameters such as fluid pressure, abrasive flow rate, and cutting speed using sensors. This feedback is fed into the control system which dynamically adjusts cutting head orientation and motion program parameters to maintain optimal cut quality. The closed-loop control ensures that deviations from desired cutting characteristics are automatically corrected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If cutting speed is reduced to minimize taper and trailback effects, then dimensional accuracy improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidcutting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts cutting parameters including speed, orientation angles, and motion program timing in real-time based on monitored operational conditions. Rather than using a fixed slow speed to ensure accuracy, the system optimizes speed and orientation combinations adaptively, allowing faster cutting when conditions permit while maintaining dimensional accuracy through real-time parameter modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system modifies multiple parameters simultaneously including cutting speed, cutting head orientation angles, and motion program timing. By changing these parameters dynamically rather than relying solely on reduced speed, the system achieves dimensional accuracy while maintaining higher productivity through optimized parameter combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring and adjustment of operational parameters is implemented, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions: it monitors operational parameters, calculates compensation values, modifies motion programs in real-time, and controls cutting head orientation. By consolidating these functions into a single integrated control system rather than separate systems for each function, the patent reduces overall system complexity while achieving real-time precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The AVCS enables faster and more precise cutting of complex parts by automatically correcting for deviations from the desired path, reducing manual intervention and improving surface finish and dimensional accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

High-pressure fluid jets, including high-pressure abrasive waterjets, are used to cut a wide variety of materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectErosion: Erosion

Implementation Method 2

Abrasive waterjets have proven to be especially useful in cutting difficult, thick, or aggregate materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP3622361B1Autonomous modification of waterjet cutting systems
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORP
  • EP3622361B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3622361B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3622361B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing real-time modification of cutting process programs using feedback from one or more sensors which measure one or more operational parameters of a cutting process and/or cutting apparatus. The sensor readings may be used to provide real-time modification of a motion program after such motion program has been provided to a motion controller. Examples of such operational parameters may include waterjet pump supply pressure, the abrasive mass flow rate, the force of the waterjet on the target piece, etc. The systems and methods discussed herein also utilize a cutting algorithm or program to calculate actual cut quality based on one or more sensor inputs, and to generate warnings or system shut-downs accordingly. The systems and methods discussed herein also utilize inspection devices to inspect coupons or first articles, and use the inspection data to autonomously modify motion programs and/or cutting process models without user intervention.