Waterjet Motion Control Using Sensor Feedback for Cut Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-axis machining systems, particularly those using high-pressure fluid jets like abrasive waterjets, face challenges in controlling cut characteristics such as taper and trailback, which can result in inconsistent product dimensions and require manual adjustments, leading to inefficiencies and reduced precision.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based control system that dynamically modifies motion programs for fluid jet apparatuses by receiving operational parameters from sensors in real-time, allowing for autonomous adjustments to lead angle, taper angle, and corner control programs to maintain desired cutting speeds and correct for deviations, thereby improving cut accuracy and reducing manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments are made to control taper and trailback, then cut accuracy can be improved, but productivity decreases due to reduced cutting speeds and increased intervention time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut accuracyVSAvoidcutting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs sensors to continuously monitor operational parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate, and jet position, feeding this data back to the controller which automatically adjusts motion program parameters to compensate for taper and trailback effects, eliminating manual intervention while maintaining cut accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system autonomously modifies motion programs based on real-time sensor data, allowing the system to self-correct cutting deviations without external human intervention, thereby maintaining precision while maximizing cutting speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If high cutting speeds are used to increase productivity, then manufacturing efficiency improves, but cut accuracy deteriorates due to increased taper and trailback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidcut accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts motion program parameters including lead angle, taper angle, and corner control in real-time based on actual cutting conditions and sensor feedback, allowing optimization of both cutting speed and accuracy throughout the cutting process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically modifies operational parameters such as feed rate, jet position, and motion trajectory based on real-time sensor measurements, adapting to changing cutting conditions to maintain accuracy at high speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If complex motion programs are used to correct taper and trailback, then cut accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms with a programmable control system that uses software algorithms to calculate and apply corrections for taper and trailback, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining or improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If real-time sensor monitoring and autonomous modification are implemented, then cut accuracy and productivity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors continuously monitor cutting parameters and feed this information back to the control system, which automatically adjusts motion programs in real-time, creating a closed-loop system that improves accuracy without requiring complex mechanical modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system autonomously processes sensor data and modifies motion programs without human intervention, allowing the system to self-optimize cutting parameters and compensate for deviations, improving both accuracy and productivity while keeping the physical system relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances control over cutting processes, minimizing taper and trailback, and ensures more precise and efficient cutting of complex shapes by automatically adjusting parameters during operation, reducing production time and human error.

Implementation Method 1

high-pressure fluid, typically water, flows through an orifice in a cutting head to form a high-pressure jet (or 'beam')

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet Erosion: Jet Erosion

Implementation Method 2

abrasive particles are combined as the jet flows through a mixing tube. The high-pressure abrasive waterjet is discharged from the mixing tube and directed toward a workpiece to cut the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS11724361B2Autonomous modification of waterjet cutting systems
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORP
  • US11724361B2 patent drawing
  • US11724361B2 patent drawing
  • US11724361B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing real-time modification of cutting process programs using feedback from one or more sensors which measure one or more operational parameters of a cutting process and/or cutting apparatus. The sensor readings may be used to provide real-time modification of a motion program after such motion program has been provided to a motion controller. Examples of such operational parameters may include waterjet pump supply pressure, the abrasive mass flow rate, the force of the waterjet on the target piece, etc. The systems and methods discussed herein also utilize a cutting algorithm or program to calculate actual cut quality based on one or more sensor inputs, and to generate warnings or system shut-downs accordingly. The systems and methods discussed herein also utilize inspection devices to inspect coupons or first articles, and use the inspection data to autonomously modify motion programs and/or cutting process models without user intervention.