Waterproof MEMS Button Structure With Integrated Fluid-Tight Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current waterproof input devices for portable electronic apparatuses face challenges with miniaturization, as existing sealing solutions are complex to manufacture and assemble, prone to wear, and consume high power, leading to reduced battery life and incomplete impermeability.

Innovation Solution

A microelectromechanical button structure with a support, cap, and piston element, featuring a ring with deformable portions and sensing elements, which detects deformation through a fluid-tight seal, eliminating the need for external sealing elements and optimizing size and power efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional sealing elements like O-rings are used to ensure waterproofing, then impermeability is improved, but device dimensions increase and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewaterproofingVSAvoiddevice dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the sealing function with the button cap structure itself. The cap is designed with an integrated sealing surface that directly contacts the support structure, eliminating the need for separate O-rings or gaskets. This integration achieves waterproofing while reducing overall device dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cap structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the button's mechanical interface, defines the cavity boundary, and creates the fluid-tight seal. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed for waterproofing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional sealing elements like O-rings are used to ensure waterproofing, then impermeability is improved, but manufacturing and assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewaterproofingVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is merged into the cap's structural design. The cap includes a sealing surface that is formed as an integral part of the cap body, requiring no separate sealing components. This reduces both manufacturing steps and assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cap structure itself provides the sealing capability through its geometric design. The sealing surface is built-in, allowing the cap to create a fluid-tight seal without requiring additional sealing elements or complex assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If traditional flexible elements with strain sensors are used, then button functionality is achieved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton functionalityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional flexible element with a rigid support structure and piston element assembly. Force application is detected through mechanical deformation of the support structure and piston element, eliminating the need for continuous power-consuming flexible elements and strain sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure and piston element serve dual purposes: they provide the mechanical button functionality and simultaneously act as the force sensing mechanism. The structural components themselves detect force application through deformation, eliminating separate sensing elements that would consume power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If traditional sealing elements are used, then initial waterproofing is achieved, but sealing capability degrades over time due to wear and aging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial waterproofingVSAvoidsealing durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is integrated into the cap's structural design rather than using separate sealing elements. This integration ensures that the sealing capability is inherent to the button's mechanical structure and will not degrade independently through wear or aging of separate sealing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cap structure itself provides and maintains the sealing capability through its rigid geometric design. The sealing surface is built-in and maintains its sealing properties as long as the cap structure remains intact, eliminating the wear and aging issues associated with separate flexible sealing elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a compact, long-lasting, and power-efficient waterproof button that maintains sensitivity and accuracy in force detection, suitable for miniaturized electronic devices without the need for additional sealing elements, enhancing battery life and assembly simplicity.

Implementation Method 1

pressing a button on a smartphone allows a user to wake up the smartphones screen when in stand-by

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11810732B2Waterproof MEMS button device, package housing the button device, and method of manufacturing the button device
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US11810732B2 patent drawing
  • US11810732B2 patent drawing
  • US11810732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A button device includes a fixed support structure; a movable structure, laterally surrounded by the support structure and configured to deform at least in part under the action of an external force; and a fluid-tight protection cap. The movable structure includes a piston element, deformable elements having piezoelectric transducers arranged thereon, and anchor elements that couple the piston element to the deformable elements. When an external force acts on the piston element, the anchor elements transfer this force to the deformable elements and to the piezoelectric transducers, so as to sense the extent of this force.