Waterproof Shape-Shifting Surface with Origami Membrane

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shape-shifting surfaces fail to provide effective, waterproof barriers that can change shape without damaging or rebuilding the surface, and are not economically viable for large-scale applications.

Innovation Solution

A waterproof shape-shifting surface composed of layered, adjacent, overlapping compliant links with a flexible membrane, allowing for compression, expansion, and shearing while maintaining a fluid-blocking capability, achieved through optimized kinematics and an origami fold pattern in the membrane.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a shape-shifting surface is designed to change shape through compliant mechanism deformation, then the surface can adapt its geometry dynamically, but it fails to provide effective waterproof barriers and allows fluid flow through the structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape-changing capabilityVSAvoidwaterproof barrier effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The surface is divided into discrete unit cells, each containing compliant links that can independently deform. This segmentation allows the surface to change shape while maintaining localized sealing capabilities through the flexible membrane in each cell, preventing fluid flow between adjacent cells even when the overall structure is deforming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A flexible membrane is integrated into each unit cell to create a waterproof barrier. The membrane is designed to deform with the compliant links while maintaining continuity and sealing, allowing the surface to change shape dynamically without compromising its ability to block fluid flow through the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Reliability

If conventional barrier surfaces are used to provide waterproof protection, then fluid flow is effectively blocked, but the surfaces cannot change shape without damaging or rebuilding the entire structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid-blocking capabilityVSAvoidshape-shifting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier surface is designed with dynamic compliant links that can deform elastically to change the shape of each unit cell. The flexible membrane within each cell dynamically adapts to the deformed configuration, allowing the surface to shift shapes reversibly without damage, unlike conventional rigid barriers that would require rebuilding when deformed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The physical parameters of the barrier surface (shape, area, volume) are changed by deforming the compliant links within each unit cell. The flexible membrane maintains fluid-blocking capability throughout these parameter changes, enabling the surface to adapt its geometry while preserving its waterproof function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If rigid structures are used to maintain structural integrity, then the surface provides stable barriers, but it cannot undergo shape changes without risk of damage or requiring reconstruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidshape-shifting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible membrane acts as a continuous barrier that maintains structural integrity while allowing elastic deformation of the compliant links. The membrane's flexibility enables shape changes without creating stress concentrations that would lead to failure, providing both strength and adaptability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The compliant mechanism design incorporates elastic elements that absorb and distribute stresses during shape changes. This beforehand cushioning prevents stress concentration and potential failure points, allowing the surface to undergo repeated shape transformations while maintaining structural integrity without requiring reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The surface effectively maintains structural integrity and watertightness while allowing shape change, reducing internal stresses and costs, with potential applications in maritime and medical industries for fluid containment and sterile barriers.

Implementation Method 1

A compliant mechanism is a flexible mechanism, known to the art, that transfers an input force or displacement from one point to another through elastic body deformation.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The flexible membrane is disposed between at least two layers of the compliant links within the cell, where the membrane is structured to have similar kinematics as the cell during manipulation of the cell. The membrane is a barrier to fluid flow normal to the membrane surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical containment: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS10336028B1Waterproof shape-shifting surface
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US10336028B1 patent drawing
  • US10336028B1 patent drawing
  • US10336028B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The first objective of this paper is to take an existing design for a shape-shifting surface (SSS) and make it waterproof, making it an effective barrier to fluid flow. The second objective is to minimize internal stresses in the device during operation, by optimizing the kinematic geometry of the SSS. The first objective was achieved by adding a waterproof membrane between the layers of the SSS, where the membrane had an origami fold pattern that enables the membrane to mimic the kinematics of the SSS. The second objective was achieved by creating a two objective optimization routine, which determined the kinematic geometry of the SSS which would minimize the internal stresses due to compression/tension of the flexure portion of the SSS during operation. The resulting SSS is easier to operate due to lower stresses, and has a membrane which prevents transverse fluid flow and mimics its motion.