Wave Assignment System for Customer Transition Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Corporate mergers and acquisitions often negatively impact customers due to changes in policies, procedures, and fees, leading to dissatisfaction and potential loss of business if not managed effectively.

Innovation Solution

A multi-wave approach is implemented to manage corporate changes, using computer systems and business rules to transition customers and their assets across institutions, prioritizing customer impact minimization by assessing account types, geographical location, and transaction behavior, with a cross-LOB leadership team to govern wave assignments and ensure seamless conversions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a multi-wave approach is implemented to manage corporate changes, then customer impact is minimized and business continuity is maintained, but the complexity of managing multiple waves and coordinating transitions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebusiness continuityVSAvoidwave management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The customer transition process is divided into multiple waves, where each wave targets specific customer segments based on their account types, geographical locations, and transaction behaviors. This segmentation allows the acquiring institution to manage transitions in controlled batches rather than all at once, maintaining business continuity while reducing overall complexity through structured progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Business rules and wave assignments are established and communicated to customers before the actual transition occurs. Pre-transition planning includes identifying at-risk customers, preparing communication strategies, and pre-configuring systems to handle different customer scenarios. This preliminary action reduces the complexity of execution during the transition waves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If comprehensive customer assessment criteria are applied to determine wave assignments, then customer impact is minimized, but the time required to process and communicate wave assignments to customers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer impactVSAvoidwave assignment processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Customers are assessed using multiple parameters including account type, geographical location, transaction behavior, and product holdings to determine wave assignments. By changing the parameters used for assessment based on customer risk profiles, the system can efficiently process customers with standard profiles using automated rules while reserving more time for complex cases, thus balancing comprehensive assessment with processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically assigns waves to customers based on pre-established business rules and criteria, minimizing manual intervention. Customers receive automated communications with their wave assignments and transition instructions. This self-service approach reduces the time required for processing while ensuring consistent, fair application of assessment criteria across all customers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated wave assignment rules are used to process customers, then processing efficiency is improved, but the ability to handle exceptional customer cases decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidexceptional case handling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

A tiered processing system uses automated wave assignment rules as an intermediary for the majority of customers, achieving high processing efficiency. For exceptional cases that do not fit standard criteria, the system provides manual review pathways where specialists can intervene. This intermediary approach maintains efficiency for routine cases while preserving adaptability for complex situations through selective human involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The wave assignment system dynamically adjusts between automated and manual processing modes based on case complexity. The system can pivot from rigid automated rules to flexible manual review when exceptional circumstances are detected. This dynamic capability allows the system to maintain high processing efficiency for typical cases while adapting to handle exceptional cases that require customized approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8504455B1Acquisition wave management
Publication Date: 2013.08.06 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC
  • US8504455B1 patent drawing
  • US8504455B1 patent drawing
  • US8504455B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Enhanced systems, processes, tools, techniques and strategies are provided for executing corporate entity changes between or among institutions, particularly with respect to minimizing the negative effects of the corporate change on customers of the institutions. In various embodiments, a method is provided for determining a wave assignment for a customer in connection with multiple waves of the corporate change. The method may include establishing a baseline wave assignment for customers of the acquired institution based on customer account data; determining lines of business associated with the customer account data; and, applying wave assignments to the customer account data in response to the baseline wave assignments and the lines of business, among other potential factors.