Two-Body Wave Energy Converter Dynamic Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Single-body wave energy converters are not well-suited for deep water environments due to the difficulty in providing deep water piling or mooring structures capable of withstanding hydrodynamic forces, and they can interfere with seabed ecosystems near shore, while two-body converters struggle to maximize relative motion between bodies for efficient energy conversion.

Innovation Solution

A two-body wave energy converter design with a primary and secondary floating body, connected by a visco-elastic connection and a generator, dynamically controls the relative motion of the bodies by varying the mass of a slug body, the stiffness or damping characteristics of the visco-elastic connection, and the load damping of the generator to optimize energy capture and conversion, even in changing wave conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If single body systems are used with piling or mooring structures, then the floating body can react against a stationary opposing body to convert kinetic energy, but it is difficult to provide deep water piling or mooring structures capable of withstanding hydrodynamic forces and they can interfere with seabed ecosystems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to withstand hydrodynamic forcesVSAvoidsuitability for deep water environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the stationary opposing body (piling or mooring structure) from the system by using a second floating body instead. This second body floats freely on the water surface without requiring deep water piling or mooring structures, thereby eliminating the need for such structures while still providing the necessary reaction force for energy conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The second floating body acts as a counterweight or reaction mass that provides the necessary opposing force for the primary floating body. Instead of using a fixed mooring structure anchored to the seabed, the system uses the buoyancy and inertia of the second floating body to create the reaction force needed for kinetic energy conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Adaptability or versatility

If two body converters are used with a second floating body, then deep water deployment is enabled without piling structures, but the relative motion between bodies is not maximized for efficient energy conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuitability for deep water environmentsVSAvoidenergy conversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes the system dynamic by allowing both the primary and secondary floating bodies to move freely on the water surface. The second floating body is not fixed but can oscillate and move in response to wave forces, enabling the system to adapt to changing wave conditions and maximize relative motion between the two bodies for efficient energy conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the floating bodies by allowing variable motion amplitudes and frequencies in response to wave conditions. The masses, buoyancy characteristics, and damping properties of both bodies are optimized to enhance phase separation and maximize relative motion under varying wave environments, thereby improving energy conversion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the second floating body remains relatively stationary to emulate single body systems, then the system is simpler to control, but the driving force to the generator and electrical energy output are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidelectrical energy output
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes the second floating body dynamic rather than stationary, allowing it to oscillate and move in response to wave forces. This dynamic behavior increases the relative motion between the primary and secondary bodies, thereby enhancing the driving force to the generator and increasing electrical energy output while maintaining manageable control through passive dynamic response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the phase separation and amplitude of oscillations between the bodies, increasing the driving force to the generator and thus the electrical energy output, while minimizing damage during extreme waves and avoiding interference with seabed ecosystems.

Implementation Method 1

connected by a visco-elastic connection and a generator, dynamically controls the relative motion of the bodies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVisco-elasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

The kinetic energy produced as the floating body oscillates relative to the stationary opposing body is converted to electrical energy by a generator coupled between the two bodies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

Wave energy (i.e. the energy of periodically oscillating waves on an ocean, sea, lake or other large body of water) can be converted to electrical energy by using the waves' buoyant force to cause a floating body to oscillate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentEP2029890B1Wave energy converter
Publication Date: 2016.01.27 TRIPLE X ENERGY
  • EP2029890B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2029890B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2029890B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A wave energy converter (100, 200 or 300) has a primary body (102, 202 or 302) interconnected to a secondary body (104, 204 or 304) such that the bodies may oscillate longitudinally relative to one another. A slug mass (106, 208 or 308) is visco-elastically connected to the primary body. The slug mass has effective mass, stiffness and damping characteristics. A generator (108, 216 or 316) is drivingly connected between the primary and secondary bodies. The generator has a load damping characteristic. At least one of the aforementioned characteristics is dynamically controllable, allowing the bodies' longitudinal motion to be varied in response to wave motion changes of the wave environment in which the wave energy converter is deployed, to maintain out-of-phase oscillation of the bodies, thus increasing the driving force imparted to the generator and thereby increasing the generator's electrical energy output.