Wave Energy Converter Internal Oscillator Spring Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wave energy converter (WEC) systems face challenges such as complex and expensive components due to marine growth, corrosion, and viscous damping, which limit energy collection and require impractically long springs to achieve desired natural periods, making it difficult to construct and house these springs within the float.

Innovation Solution

A WEC system incorporating an internal oscillator with a reaction mass and a parallel combination of an elastic spring and a constant force spring, where the constant force spring counterbalances the static weight of the reaction mass, allowing the elastic spring to maintain a reduced static length while providing the necessary dynamic range, thus reducing the physical size and complexity of the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a spring is designed to provide the desired natural period for wave energy conversion, then the energy conversion efficiency is improved, but the spring length becomes impractically long and difficult to house within the float

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conversion efficiencyVSAvoidspring length
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the counterweight principle by introducing a reaction mass that is suspended from the float by a spring. The reaction mass counterbalances the buoyant force on the float, allowing the spring to be optimized for dynamic wave energy conversion rather than static support. This enables the spring to be much shorter while still providing the desired natural period for energy conversion, as the spring only needs to handle dynamic oscillations rather than the full static weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Productivity

If the float and spar are exposed to water elements to capture wave energy, then the energy collection capability is improved, but the components become subject to marine growth, corrosion, and contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy collection capabilityVSAvoidmarine growth, corrosion, contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the power take-off device and bearings from the water environment by placing them inside the float. The reaction mass and spring system are contained within the float, allowing mechanical components to operate in a protected, dry environment. Only the float itself remains exposed to water, minimizing the surface area subject to marine growth and corrosion while maintaining wave energy capture capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an air-tight seal as an intermediary between the water environment and the internal mechanical components. This seal allows the float to be exposed to water for energy capture while protecting the internal power take-off device, bearings, and spring-mass system from marine growth, corrosion, and contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the spring length is reduced for compact design, then the device complexity and physical size are reduced, but the static weight balance becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidstatic weight balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction mass serves as a counterweight that balances the buoyant force on the float. By positioning the reaction mass and adjusting its weight, the system achieves static equilibrium without requiring a long spring for support. The spring only needs to provide the necessary stiffness for dynamic oscillation at the desired natural period, enabling a compact design while maintaining proper weight balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables efficient energy conversion by reducing the static length of the elastic spring, allowing for a more compact design that can still capture wave energy effectively, overcoming the limitations of long springs and improving hydrodynamic performance.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic spring and constant force spring which connect the reaction mass to the float

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

internal oscillator including a reaction mass and a spring system... relative motion between the float and the reaction mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHarmonic oscillation: Harmonic Oscillator

Data Source

PatentUS8067849B2Wave energy converter with internal mass on spring oscillator
Publication Date: 2011.11.29 OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8067849B2 patent drawing
  • US8067849B2 patent drawing
  • US8067849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wave energy converter (WEC) system includes a shell containing an internal oscillator comprised of a reaction mass suspended from the shell by an elastic spring in parallel with a constant force spring. The constant force spring provides a relatively constant force (Fc) to counterbalance the static weight of the reaction mass and reduce the extension “static” length of the elastic spring while the elastic spring exerts a force (Fes) on the reaction mass that is proportional to the displacement, x, of the elastic spring. A power take-off (PTO) device, located within the shell, coupled between the shell and the internal oscillator converts their relative motion into electrical energy.