Wave-Fin Refrigerator Condenser for Compact Heat Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional refrigerators face limitations in condenser size due to inefficient heat radiation, leading to suboptimal refrigerant condensation within the limited space of the machinery compartment.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a refrigerant pipe with a plate fin and wave fin structure, where the pipe is bent and connected by heat radiating pipes, with the plate fin and wave fin made of aluminum and coupled through brazing, enhancing heat radiating efficiency and allowing for miniaturization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the condenser uses a conventional structure, then the manufacturing is simple, but the heat radiating efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat radiating efficiencyVSAvoidcondenser structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature to the fin surfaces by forming wave-shaped patterns on the fins. These curved/waved fin surfaces increase the surface area for heat radiation compared to flat fins, thereby improving heat radiating efficiency. The curvature is achieved through forming processes that create sinusoidal or wave-like patterns on the fin surfaces while they are in a flexible state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional flat fin structure to a three-dimensional waved fin structure. By adding the wave dimension perpendicular to the flat fin surface, the heat radiating surface area is significantly increased without substantially increasing the footprint area, thereby improving heat radiating efficiency within the same spatial envelope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the condenser size is reduced, then the space efficiency is improved, but the heat radiating efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondenser sizeVSAvoidheat radiating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-layered fin structure where waved fins are arranged in overlapping layers. The fins are positioned such that they nest within each other's spatial envelope, creating a compact stacked arrangement. This nesting approach maximizes the heat radiating surface area within a reduced volume by efficiently utilizing vertical and horizontal space through layered configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The waved/curved fin surfaces increase the heat radiating surface area within a compact footprint. The curvature allows the fins to pack more efficiently in three-dimensional space, enabling a smaller overall condenser volume while maintaining or enhancing heat radiating capability through the increased effective surface area of the curved fins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Loss of energy

If the fin surface area is increased, then the heat radiating efficiency is improved, but the device occupies more space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat radiating efficiencyVSAvoidcondenser footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by transitioning from a two-dimensional planar fin arrangement to a three-dimensional waved fin structure. The wave patterns add vertical dimension to the fin surfaces, increasing heat radiating area without proportionally increasing the horizontal footprint. Multiple layers of fins are stacked vertically, allowing substantial surface area expansion while maintaining a compact base area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves heat radiating efficiency, enabling effective refrigerant condensation even in compact spaces, reducing energy consumption and allowing for a more compact condenser design.

Implementation Method 1

a plate fin coupled to one side portion of the refrigerant pipe; and a wave fin provided to make contact with a rear surface portion of the plate fin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a condenser to condense the refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

improved heat radiating efficiency, and thus a miniaturization thereof may be achieved while enhancing space efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentEP3156744B1Condenser and refrigerator having same
Publication Date: 2019.04.10 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP3156744B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3156744B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3156744B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A condenser (100) and a refrigerator (1) having the same, the condenser (100) includes a refrigerant pipe (110), a plate fin (130) coupled to one side portion of the refrigerant pipe (110), and a wave fin (140) making contact with a rear surface of the plate fin (130). Through the structure as such, the condensation efficiency of the condenser (100) may be enhanced, and furthermore, the condenser (100) may be miniaturized, and thus is effective in utilizing space.