Wave-Shaped Reinforcing Element for Punching Shear Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Punching shear failures occur in concrete components under local increased loads, as they cannot absorb transverse forces within their concrete load-bearing capacity, leading to potential structural failures.

Innovation Solution

A wave-shaped reinforcing element with inclined waves is introduced into the concrete reinforcement system, where the waves are angled to align with the direction of the increased load, enhancing the punching shear resistance by distributing the load effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional straight reinforcement bars are used, then the concrete load-bearing capacity is maintained, but the punching shear resistance is insufficient under local increased loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepunching shear resistanceVSAvoidreinforcement structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement bar is formed with corrugations featuring rounded fourth sections connecting straight third sections, creating a curved wave-shaped profile. This curvature enables the reinforcement to better distribute localized loads and resist punching shear forces compared to straight bars, while maintaining manufacturability through standard corrugation forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The corrugations are strategically positioned and oriented with specific section angles (10° ≤ α ≤ 80°) to address the local stress concentration at punching shear critical sections. The wave-shaped profile creates localized reinforcement zones that specifically target areas of high shear stress without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the section angle of reinforcing corrugations is increased to improve load distribution, then the punching shear resistance increases, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload distribution capabilityVSAvoidcorrugation forming difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The section angle α of the corrugations is optimized within the range 10° ≤ α ≤ 80° (preferably 30° ≤ α ≤ 75° or 50° ≤ α ≤ 60°) to achieve effective load distribution. This parameter optimization balances manufacturing feasibility with structural performance, avoiding excessively steep angles that would be difficult to form while ensuring sufficient shear resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The corrugations extend partially along the reinforcement bar length rather than requiring complete coverage, with the wave pattern concentrated at critical sections. This partial action approach provides sufficient punching shear resistance at key locations without the manufacturing complexity of fully corrugated bars throughout their entire length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4442921A1Reinforcement element for a punching and shear reinforcement system
Publication Date: 2024.10.09 FIR GRP AG
  • EP4442921A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4442921A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4442921A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Reinforcing element (3) for a punching shear reinforcement system (10) for a concrete structural element, comprising at least one corrugated reinforcing bar (30) with a first free end and a second free end opposite it, wherein reinforcing waves (303;304) are formed in a third direction (Z), and wherein at least one inclined reinforcing wave is provided which comprises straight third parts (303) which extend at a part angle of 10° ≤ α ≤ 80° with respect to the third direction (Z), whereby the at least one inclined reinforcing wave is inclined towards the second free end of the reinforcing bar (30).