Graded Waveguide Coating for Uniform Multi-Wavelength Emission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing waveguides struggle to provide spatially homogeneous emission with consistent intensity and spectrum across multiple wavelengths, leading to variability in image brightness and quality as viewers move around the viewing window.

Innovation Solution

A waveguide with a graded transmission coating comprising alternating layers of dielectrics with limited discrete thickness changes, optimized for specific wavelengths, such as red, green, and blue, to ensure consistent intensity and spectrum across replicas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a conventional waveguide coating is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the emission uniformity and image quality vary across different viewing angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission uniformityVSAvoidcoating structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coating is segmented into multiple discrete layers (at least two layers) with different optical properties. Each layer has specific thickness ranges (first layer: 50-200nm, second layer: 200-500nm) and refractive index characteristics that work together to achieve uniform emission across viewing angles, replacing the conventional single homogeneous coating layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the coating structure have optimized local properties - the first layer has specific thickness (50-200nm) and refractive index suited for certain wavelength ranges, while the second layer has different thickness (200-500nm) and refractive index for complementary wavelengths. This local optimization of each layer's properties achieves global emission uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If the waveguide coating is optimized for multiple wavelengths, then the spectrum consistency improves, but the absorption losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-wavelength performanceVSAvoidabsorption losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The coating parameters (layer thicknesses and refractive indices) are specifically optimized for multiple wavelengths including red (630-670nm), green (500-540nm), and blue (430-470nm) regions. The first layer thickness of 50-200nm and second layer thickness of 200-500nm create constructive interference patterns across these wavelength ranges, achieving broad spectral consistency while managing absorption through precise parameter control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Illumination intensity

If the waveguide coating is optimized for specific wavelengths, then the image quality and consistency improve, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage brightness consistencyVSAvoidcoating thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Specific parameter ranges are defined to balance performance and manufacturability: first layer thickness 50-200nm, second layer thickness 200-500nm, with refractive index constraints (|n1-n2|>0.4). These parameter specifications achieve image brightness consistency across viewing angles while remaining within achievable manufacturing tolerances for conventional deposition processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The coating uses composite dielectric material structures with at least two different materials having distinct refractive indices. This composite approach enables wavelength-selective optical control through the interference effects of layered structures, achieving image quality consistency while using materials that can be deposited with standard manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides spatially homogeneous emission with reduced absorption losses and manufacturing complexity, enhancing image quality and consistency across different viewing angles.

Implementation Method 1

A first surface of the pair of parallel surfaces comprises a plurality of layers of a first dielectric and a plurality of layers of second dielectric arranged in an alternating configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

A difference in refractive index between the first dielectric and second dielectric is greater than 0.4

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

Light scattered from an object contains both amplitude and phase information... A waveguide with a graded transmission coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal internal reflection: Total Internal Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4607251A1Waveguide coating optimisation
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 ENVISICS LTD
  • EP4607251A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4607251A1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4607251A1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A method of forming a transmission coating for a waveguide. The transmission coating comprises a plurality of layers. The method comprises a step a of determining a first coating parameter and a coating function for each layer to optimise the transmissivity at a plurality of locations along the waveguide for a plurality of different wavelengths. The coating function is chosen from a plurality of allowable coating functions. Next, there is a step b of forming the plurality of layers using the determined coating parameters and coating functions. Then, there is a step c of measuring a thickness of at least one layer at each of the plurality of locations. The measurements indicate that the coating function deviates from that selected during the optimisation of step a. Finally, there is a step d of determining a second coating parameter for at least one layer by repeating the optimisation of step a using the coating function derived from the measurements of step c.