Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator Dual-Analysis Power Saving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WCD) systems face challenges in efficiently detecting shockable arrhythmias due to computationally intensive algorithms, which drain battery energy and require more extensive processing, leading to bulkier and heavier devices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual-analysis approach where a first-level, computationally economical analysis serves as a gatekeeper to prevent unnecessary execution of a more intensive second-level analysis, reducing energy consumption and device size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If computationally intensive algorithms are used to detect shockable arrhythmias, then detection reliability is improved, but battery energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidbattery energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rhythm analysis is divided into two distinct levels: a first level that performs basic detection functions with lower computational requirements, and a second level that performs more intensive analysis only when needed. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliable detection capabilities while significantly reducing overall energy consumption by limiting intensive computations to specific situations rather than continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If computationally intensive algorithms are used for rhythm analysis, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis is segmented into two levels with different computational intensities. The first level handles routine monitoring with simpler algorithms, while the second level provides enhanced accuracy only when triggered by specific conditions. This segmentation maintains high detection accuracy when needed while avoiding the continuous complexity of running intensive algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by performing intensive second-level analysis only partially - specifically when the first level detects certain conditions warrant further investigation. Rather than continuously applying the most accurate but complex algorithms, the system uses them selectively, thereby maintaining accuracy when needed while reducing overall device complexity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Duration of action of moving object

If more energy is stored in the battery, then operational duration is extended, but device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational durationVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of limited battery capacity (which would require larger batteries for extended operation) into a benefit by using computationally economical algorithms. The reduced computational requirements lower energy consumption, which in turn allows for smaller, lighter batteries while still achieving the desired operational duration. The 'harm' of computational limitations becomes the 'blessing' of reduced weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11969607B2Wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) with power-saving function
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 WEST AFFUM HLDG DAC
  • US11969607B2 patent drawing
  • US11969607B2 patent drawing
  • US11969607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WCD) system has a processor that performs two different analyses to an ECG of the patient. A first-level analysis can be computationally economical, while a fuller second-level analysis can give shock/no-shock advice with more certainty. In some of these embodiments the second-level analysis of the ECG is performed only if the first-level analysis of the ECG detects a possible shockable condition. As such, the first-level analysis may operate as a gatekeeping function, often preventing the more computationally intensive second-level analysis from being performed. An advantage can be that the WCD system needs to store less charge, for powering the processor. In turn, this permits portions of the WCD system to be less bulky and weigh less.