Wearable Contextual Awareness via Risk Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is difficult for pedestrians to be aware of activities behind them, especially with distractions from modern technology, leading to potential accidents from unseen motion or sound events.

Innovation Solution

A wearable device using an encoder-decoder network and convolutional neural networks to detect and analyze motion and sound events, providing notifications through a scoring mechanism when significant events are detected, such as approaching vehicles or familiar individuals, via a notification system that includes augmented reality, haptic vibrations, or audio alerts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a pedestrian uses modern technology devices for distraction or entertainment, then the user experiences entertainment or information access, but the pedestrian's awareness of surrounding activities decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser entertainment accessVSAvoidawareness of surrounding activities
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary device (wearable computing device) that mediates between the user and the environment. The device captures environmental data through sensors and presents processed information to the user, allowing the user to remain engaged with technology while staying aware of surroundings. The intermediary translates environmental events into actionable notifications without requiring the user to directly observe the environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring environmental conditions and providing real-time notifications to the user. The feedback loop captures motion and sound events, processes them through machine learning models, and delivers relevant alerts, creating a closed-loop system that informs the user of potentially hazardous situations while allowing continued use of technology devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system provides comprehensive monitoring of all environmental events, then the safety awareness is improved, but the notification system becomes overly complex and generates excessive alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety awarenessVSAvoidnotification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating the importance of various environmental events and applying different notification strategies based on event significance. Not all events receive equal attention - the system evaluates contextual factors such as event type, location, and potential impact on user safety to determine which events warrant notification. This selective approach reduces unnecessary alerts while maintaining high safety awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting notification thresholds and sensitivity levels based on contextual analysis. Machine learning models evaluate multiple parameters simultaneously (motion intensity, sound frequency, event sequence) and adjust the likelihood of notification accordingly. This parameter-based filtering reduces complexity by establishing clear decision criteria rather than requiring complex rule-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system analyzes detailed contextual information about events, then the accuracy of risk assessment is improved, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and categorizing environmental data as events occur, rather than analyzing all data in detail at the time of notification decision. Motion and sound events are captured and preliminarily classified, with only significant events triggering detailed contextual analysis. This staged approach maintains accuracy for critical events while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by analyzing only the necessary level of detail for each specific event type. Not all events require the same depth of analysis - the system adjusts the extent of contextual information gathered based on the nature of the event and its potential impact. This selective analysis maintains risk assessment accuracy for hazardous events while minimizing unnecessary processing for minor events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11367355B2Contextual event awareness via risk analysis and notification delivery system
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11367355B2 patent drawing
  • US11367355B2 patent drawing
  • US11367355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach for contextual event awareness, a processor receives contextual information including motion and sound detection. A processor analyzes the contextual information to determine a proximity sequencing including context of an event. A processor applies machine learning to the proximity sequencing to form a risk assessment based on the context of the event impacting a user. A processor determines that the risk assessment exceeds a predetermined threshold. A processor provides a notification of a risk to the user.