Wearable Core Contraction Detection for Spinal Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current health and fitness wearables lack a convenient and effective way to teach and encourage the use of core muscles during everyday movements, which is essential for supporting the lumbosacral junction and lumbar spine, leading to difficulties in developing procedural memory for core support.

Innovation Solution

A wearable device equipped with sensors like accelerometers and gyros, using inertial navigation and algorithms to identify Qualifying Movements (QMs) and provide feedback on core muscle contraction, helping users develop the habit of protecting their lumbar spine by contracting core muscles during stress periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If health and fitness wearables track basic movements using accelerometers and altimeters, then step counting and activity monitoring are achieved, but the ability to teach and encourage core muscle use during everyday movements is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to teach and encourage core muscle useVSAvoidsystem complexity for core muscle detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wearable device performs multiple functions: it tracks basic movements (steps, stairs) using accelerometers and altimeters, and simultaneously detects core muscle contraction through additional sensors. The system identifies Qualifying Movements and determines whether they are protected or unprotected based on core muscle status, providing comprehensive health monitoring without requiring separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines basic movement tracking functionality with core muscle detection capability into a single integrated system. The processor analyzes data from both the motion sensors (accelerometers, altimeters) and core contraction sensors together to determine movement protection status, merging these functions into one cohesive wearable device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If the system provides detailed feedback on core muscle contraction during movements, then procedural memory for core support is developed, but the device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedural memory development for core supportVSAvoidprocessing and feedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to the user about their core muscle usage during Qualifying Movements. By detecting whether core muscles are contracted during stress periods and providing this information back to the user, the system helps them develop procedural memory for proper core support without requiring complex external monitoring equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The wearable device enables users to self-monitor and self-correct their core muscle usage patterns. Through automated detection and feedback mechanisms, users can independently develop proper movement habits without requiring constant guidance from trainers or therapists, reducing the need for complex external intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the wearable device uses inertial navigation with multiple sensors to identify Qualifying Movements, then movement identification accuracy is improved, but power consumption and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement identification accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption for sensor processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the movement analysis into distinct Qualifying Movements that require core muscle support. Rather than continuously analyzing all movements with full sensor suites, the processor identifies specific movement types (such as standing from sitting, lifting) and applies detailed analysis only to these qualifying cases, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining accuracy for critical movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively teaches and encourages core muscle use during QMs, promoting procedural memory development for core support, thereby reducing the risk of spinal instability and associated pain.

Implementation Method 1

utilize accelerometers, altimeters, light sources and sensors, and voltage sensors to sense and detect the parameters they measure and track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

Inertial navigation is a method utilizing accelerometers, gyroscopes or gyros, and a microprocessor contained on a moving object to continuously calculate device positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyro: Gyroscope

Implementation Method 3

utilize accelerometers, altimeters, light sources and sensors, and voltage sensors to sense and detect the parameters they measure and track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAltimeter: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS9706962B1Apparatus and method for teaching and algorithms for identifying qualifying movements
Publication Date: 2017.07.18 ALERT CORE
  • US9706962B1 patent drawing
  • US9706962B1 patent drawing
  • US9706962B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wearable device has user movement sensors and core contraction sensors. Signals from the sensors are transmitted to a processor which analyzes the movement signals and determines when a qualifying movement is performed which benefits from core contraction. Signals from the core contraction sensors are also transmitted to the processor and are used to determine if the core is contracted during the qualifying movement. If the core is contracted during the qualifying movement, the movement is a protected qualifying movement. However, if the core is not contracted during the qualifying movement the movement is an unprotected qualifying movement. The system can inform the user when unprotected qualifying movements are performed.