Wearable Fall Detection Using IMU Data and ML Confirmation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fall detection systems are bulky, uncomfortable, and lack accuracy in differentiating between falls and similar movements, often failing to predict fall risks and confirm falls in real-time, leading to delayed assistance.

Innovation Solution

A compact, unobtrusive wearable device using an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and pedometer to analyze user movements, employing machine learning models for real-time fall risk prediction and confirmation, transmitting distress signals when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fall detection devices (pendants, belts, wrist-worn devices) are used, then fall detection function is provided, but the devices become bulky and uncomfortable for long-term wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection functionVSAvoidcomfortability for long-term wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple fall detection technologies (accelerometer, gyroscope, pressure sensor) into a single integrated wearable device. This merging of functions allows the device to maintain comprehensive fall detection capabilities while reducing overall bulk and improving comfortability for long-term wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The wearable device is designed to perform multiple functions including fall detection, activity monitoring, and health tracking. By making the device universal and multi-functional, it becomes more justifiable for continuous wear as users derive additional value beyond just fall detection, thereby improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If simplistic algorithms or basic motion detection methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to differentiate between falls and similar movements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm simplicityVSAvoidfall detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces basic mechanical motion detection with advanced machine learning algorithms that process data from multiple sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope, pressure sensor). This substitution enables sophisticated pattern recognition that can accurately differentiate between falls and similar movements while maintaining reasonable device complexity through optimized algorithm implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediaries between raw sensor data and fall detection decisions. These intermediary processing layers analyze complex patterns from multiple sensor inputs and provide more accurate fall detection, resolving the contradiction between algorithm simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If conventional fall detection systems are used, then basic fall detection is achieved, but real-time fall risk prediction capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection capabilityVSAvoidfall risk prediction information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements machine learning models that continuously analyze user movement patterns to predict fall risk before actual falls occur. This preliminary action of risk assessment allows the system to provide early warnings and preventive recommendations, capturing valuable predictive information that conventional reactive systems miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user movements and provides feedback through fall risk predictions and real-time detection. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt to individual user patterns and provide increasingly accurate predictions, preventing information loss by continuously processing and acting on movement data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If basic motion detection is used, then device complexity is minimized, but the ability to confirm falls in real-time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoidfall confirmation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces basic motion detection with machine learning-based analysis that processes data from multiple sensors in real-time. This substitution enables rapid fall confirmation by automatically analyzing complex movement patterns and providing immediate results, reducing confirmation time without requiring overly complex manual review systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides continuous, accurate fall risk prediction and detection, minimizing false alerts and ensuring timely assistance, even in cases where the user is immobile.

Implementation Method 1

retrieving motion data of the user, wherein the motion data is recorded by an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS20260026710A1Wearable device with user movement analysis and fall risk prediction and fall detection capability
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 ULTRAHUMAN HEALTHCARE PVT LTD
  • US20260026710A1 patent drawing
  • US20260026710A1 patent drawing
  • US20260026710A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and wearable device for monitoring and analyzing user movements to predict fall risk. The method involves retrieving motion data recorded by an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and a pedometer, followed by processing the data once it exceeds a predefined threshold. A first trained machine learning (ML) model predicts the fall risk based on the processed data. A confidence score is determined from the fall prediction, and a second trained ML model analyzes successive data frames to confirm the fall if the score is above a threshold. If a fall is confirmed, a distress signal is transmitted. The wearable device comprises a processor and memory that stores program instructions to perform the method, including motion data retrieval, processing, fall prediction, confidence scoring, and fall confirmation, along with distress signal transmission. This invention enables timely fall detection and emergency response, improving user safety.