Wearable Heart Rate Detection With Adaptive Motion Noise Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable devices with heart rate detection functions face challenges due to motion noise interference, leading to complex calculations and increased manufacturing costs, and difficulties in accurately determining heart rates during physical activity.

Innovation Solution

A wearable device with a heart rate detection assembly and processor that utilizes a finite state machine to determine heart rate states based on crest factors and variability, filtering out motion noise using a Wiener filter and adjusting sampling parameters to improve accuracy and reduce computational burden.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex calculations are used to filter motion noise from heart rate signals, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheart rate detection accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the heart rate signal processing into distinct stages: raw signal acquisition, motion noise identification through variability analysis, selective filtering application, and final heart rate calculation. This segmentation allows complex filtering operations to be applied only when and where needed, rather than continuously to all signals, reducing overall computational burden while maintaining accuracy when motion noise is present

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes processing parameters based on signal characteristics. By calculating heart rate variability and comparing it against thresholds, the system adapts the level of filtering applied - using more aggressive filtering only when variability indicates motion noise presence. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting computational intensity to match actual signal quality needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If complex calculations are used to filter motion noise from heart rate signals, then measurement precision is improved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheart rate detection accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs computationally inexpensive algorithms that can be implemented in low-cost microcontrollers. Rather than using expensive dedicated hardware or complex signal processing chips, the solution uses software-based variability analysis and adaptive filtering that runs efficiently on inexpensive processors, reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining adequate measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts processing intensity based on signal quality metrics. When motion noise is detected through variability analysis, the system increases filtering aggressiveness; when signals are clean, it reduces processing. This adaptive approach allows the use of simpler, cheaper hardware that wouldn't be sufficient for continuous high-precision processing, thereby resolving the cost-precision tradeoff

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If complex calculations are used to filter motion noise, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheart rate detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides signal processing into lightweight preliminary steps (variability calculation, threshold comparison) and heavier filtering operations. The segmentation ensures that computationally intensive filtering is applied only in brief intervals when motion noise is detected, rather than continuously, thereby maintaining measurement precision while preserving overall processing throughput and system responsiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies filtering selectively rather than continuously - using partial action only when variability metrics indicate motion noise presence. This approach processes signals faster on average by skipping unnecessary filtering operations during clean signal periods, while still achieving high measurement precision when motion interference occurs, thus resolving the productivity-precision contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4268715B1Wearable device with heart rate detection, dynamic heart rate detection method and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 WISTRON CORP
  • EP4268715B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4268715B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4268715B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A wearable device with heart rate detection (100) includes a heart rate detection assembly (101) and a processor (102). The heart rate detection assembly (101) is configured to obtain a plurality of dynamic heart rate signals according to a default frequency. The processor (102) includes a finite state machine (103) and a storage (104). The storage (104) is configured to store the plurality of dynamic heart rate signals, and the finite state machine (103) determines a heart rate state according to a sampling parameter and the plurality of dynamic heart rate signals. The processor (102) obtains a weight according to the heart rate state, and obtains a dynamic heart rate value according to the weight.