Wearable Heatstroke Warning Using Personalized Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing warning systems fail to provide timely and appropriate treatment for poor physical health, illness, or injury of monitored individuals, particularly when supervisors or medical practitioners are outside the work area, and do not account for individual variations in risk assessment.

Innovation Solution

A warning system that calculates a degree of risk based on biological and environmental information, using a wearable device to issue warnings to the individual, supervisor, or medical facility based on individual acclimation and surroundings, reducing false reports and optimizing resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If heatstroke evaluation is performed based on biological information and environment information, then heatstroke prevention is improved, but the ability to provide timely treatment for other illnesses or injuries is not addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheatstroke preventionVSAvoidevaluation coverage for illnesses and injuries
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The warning system is designed to evaluate multiple types of health risks beyond heatstroke, including other illnesses and injuries. The risk evaluation unit calculates degrees of risk for various health conditions by comprehensively analyzing biological information from wearable devices and environment information, making the system versatile for different health emergencies while maintaining reliable heatstroke prevention capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If warnings are issued only within the work area, then local heatstroke prevention is improved, but supervisors and medical practitioners outside the work area cannot implement timely treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal heatstroke preventionVSAvoidtreatment response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the warning issuance unit sends notifications to both portable terminals within the work area and external supervisors or medical practitioners. When the risk evaluation unit calculates a high degree of risk for heatstroke or other health conditions, warnings are transmitted to multiple recipients including those outside the work area, ensuring timely treatment can be initiated by external medical personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment continuously by acquiring biological information from wearable devices and environment information before health emergencies occur. This allows the risk evaluation unit to calculate degrees of risk in advance and issue warnings to external supervisors and medical practitioners before the monitored person actually experiences heatstroke or other illnesses, enabling preliminary preparation for timely treatment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If uniform warning thresholds are used for all monitored persons, then system simplicity is maintained, but individual variations in risk assessment are not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidindividual risk assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The risk evaluation unit calculates individualized degrees of risk for each monitored person by analyzing their specific biological information (such as heart rate, body temperature, and other physiological data from wearable devices) combined with environment information. This allows the system to account for individual variations in physical condition, age, and health status, providing personalized risk assessment rather than applying uniform thresholds to all monitored persons

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12525109B2Warning method and warning system
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12525109B2 patent drawing
  • US12525109B2 patent drawing
  • US12525109B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A warning system includes an information acquisition unit, a risk degree calculation unit and an alarm. The information acquisition unit acquires a heart rate and an acceleration, which are items of biological information pertaining to a monitored person, as well as temperature and humidity, which are items of environment information pertaining to surroundings of the monitored person. The risk degree calculation unit calculates a degree of risk relating to heatstroke in the monitored person based on the heart rate, acceleration, temperature, and humidity. The alarm issues a warning based on an extent of the calculated degree of risk. The alarm modifies a scope of the warning according to the extent of the degree of risk.