Wearable Image Context for Ambiguous XR Voice Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing XR devices struggle with initiating actions using verbal commands that include vague language, such as demonstrative pronouns like 'this' and 'that', leading to ambiguity and inefficiency in user interactions.

Innovation Solution

The XR device employs a model that combines natural language processing with computer vision to supplement verbal commands with sensor and image data, using APIs to identify and execute actions based on user intent, even with ambiguous terms, by leveraging a neural network or alternative models to refine processing and determine relevant objects in the user's environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If verbal commands with vague language (e.g., demonstrative pronouns) are used, then user interaction becomes more natural and intuitive, but ambiguity increases and action identification becomes unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction naturalnessVSAvoidaction identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an image processing intermediary that captures visual context from the environment and combines it with the verbal command. The image serves as a mediator that disambiguates vague pronouns by identifying referenced objects visually, allowing the system to resolve ambiguity while maintaining natural interaction. For example, when a user says 'move that object,' the image processing identifies which object is being referred to based on visual context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple input modalities (verbal commands and visual image data) into a unified processing framework. By combining the semantic information from speech with the spatial and contextual information from images, the system creates a more robust interpretation of user intent. This multi-modal merging allows vague verbal references to be resolved through visual confirmation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional verbal command processing is used, then device complexity remains low, but the system cannot resolve ambiguous references in commands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand interpretation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal processing framework that handles both simple and complex commands through a single integrated system. The same image processing and model application infrastructure that resolves ambiguous pronouns also enhances the interpretation of all verbal commands, providing multi-functionality. This universal approach allows the system to handle diverse command types without requiring separate specialized processing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary image capture and processing before final command interpretation. By pre-processing the visual context and preparing object identification data in advance, the system reduces the complexity of the final decision-making process. The model is applied to images and commands in advance to identify potential objects and their characteristics, making the final action selection more efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If image processing and model application are applied to every command, then object identification accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification accuracyVSAvoidcommand processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies image processing and model application selectively rather than universally to all commands. When a command contains ambiguous references or object identifiers, the system triggers image processing to resolve the ambiguity. For straightforward commands without ambiguous references, the system may proceed with minimal or no image processing, thus avoiding unnecessary processing time while maintaining high accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260024163A1Initiating application actions on a wearable device using context from images
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260024163A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024163A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024163A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to at least one implementation, a method includes identifying a command from a user of a device. In response to the command, the method further includes identifying an image associated with a gaze of the user and identifying an action based on an application of a language model to the command and the image, the application of the language model including an identification of an object for the command in the image.