Wearable Interface Design Using Tissue Viscoelastic Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mechanical interfaces for wearable technology, such as prosthetic limbs and exoskeletons, fail to accurately represent the anatomical, biomechanical, and physiological properties of the human body, leading to discomfort due to excessive pressures, internal strains, and skin chafing, as they do not account for the continuously varying viscoelastic properties of the body's tissues.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing force-sensitive probes, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and magnetometers to measure tissue deflection and compute viscoelastic properties, allowing for the creation of a mechanical interface with spatially varying material properties that match the body's anatomy, thereby minimizing discomfort and improving fit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional plaster molding and homogeneous material fabrication are used, then the manufacturing process is simple and inexpensive, but the mechanical interface does not accurately represent the continuously varying viscoelastic properties of body tissues, causing discomfort and skin chafing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tissue property representationVSAvoidcomplexity of fabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a mechanical interface with spatially varying material properties that match the locally varying viscoelastic characteristics of different body tissue regions. The fabrication process uses 3D printed layers with different material compositions and mechanical properties to represent the heterogeneous nature of underlying anatomy, allowing each region of the interface to have optimized properties for its specific location rather than using homogeneous materials throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining multiple materials with different viscoelastic properties within a single mechanical interface structure. The 3D printing process integrates layers of materials with varying stiffness, damping, and elasticity characteristics to create a composite structure that mimics the complex, multi-tissue nature of the body, enabling the interface to simultaneously provide support in rigid regions and compliance in soft tissue regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If homogeneous material properties are used throughout the interface, then the fabrication process is simplified, but the interface cannot adapt to the multi-tissue, continuously-varying viscoelastic properties of the underlying anatomy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying tissue propertiesVSAvoidease of fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying material properties (viscoelasticity, stiffness, damping) across different regions and layers of the mechanical interface during fabrication. The 3D printing process enables continuous adjustment of material parameters to match the spatially varying characteristics of underlying tissues, allowing the interface to adapt to the multi-tissue nature of the anatomy rather than requiring a single homogeneous material property throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates dynamics by designing the mechanical interface to exhibit time-dependent, rate-sensitive mechanical behavior that mirrors the viscoelastic nature of biological tissues. The interface materials and structure are engineered to display different mechanical responses under varying load rates and deformation conditions, enabling dynamic adaptation to the living, moving body rather than maintaining static, fixed properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If the interface is designed to be rigid for structural support, then mechanical strength is improved, but excessive pressures and internal strains are generated causing wearer discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural support capabilityVSAvoidexcessive pressure and skin chafing
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing rigid structural support only in specific regions where mechanical strength is required, while incorporating compliant, softer materials in regions that contact sensitive skin areas. This spatial differentiation allows the interface to simultaneously achieve the necessary structural integrity for load-bearing functions and the surface compliance needed to minimize excessive pressures and prevent skin chafing in different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials to combine rigid structural components with compliant surface layers, creating a multi-material interface that delivers both strength and comfort. The composite structure allows rigid materials to provide skeletal support and load transfer while softer materials interface with the skin to distribute pressures and reduce friction, eliminating the need to choose between strength and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Measurement precision

If quantitative measurement of tissue viscoelastic properties is implemented, then the accuracy of interface design is improved, but the measurement and fabrication process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of tissue property measurementVSAvoidcomplexity of measurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with non-contact or minimally invasive sensing technologies to quantify tissue viscoelastic properties. By using optical, electromagnetic, or other advanced sensing methods instead of traditional mechanical probing, the system achieves precise measurement of tissue characteristics without requiring complex mechanical apparatus, thereby improving measurement precision while controlling system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables the design and fabrication of mechanical interfaces that accurately reflect the body's viscoelastic properties, reducing discomfort and enhancing the fit and functionality of wearable devices by quantitatively mapping anatomical and biomechanical data to interface shape and impedance characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

pushes on the force sensitive probes with varying force applied on the body segment to measure tissue deflection forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTissue deflection: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

one or more of gyroscopes, accelerometers, and magnetometers capable of measuring changes in tissue deflection caused by the one or more force sensitive probes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 3

one or more of gyroscopes, accelerometers, and magnetometers capable of measuring changes in tissue deflection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field sensing: Magnetometer

Implementation Method 4

the tissue deflection force data and the change in tissue deflection data are used to compute segment tissue viscoelastic properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12138039B2Mechanisms and methods for the design and fabrication of a mechanical interface between a wearable device and a human body segment
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 BIONIC SKINS
  • US12138039B2 patent drawing
  • US12138039B2 patent drawing
  • US12138039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The system includes an instrument for determining the anatomical, biomechanical, and physiological properties of a body segment that includes one or more force sensitive probes is provided. A human operator actuates one or more force sensitive probes, wherein the force sensitive probes are positioned at the surface of the body segment. The operator pushes on the force sensitive probes with varying force applied on the body segment to measure tissue deflection forces. The instrument may include one or more of gyroscopes, accelerometers, and magnetometers capable of measuring changes in tissue deflection caused by the force sensitive probes relative to a grounded reference frame in 3-D space, wherein the tissue deflection force data and the change in tissue deflection data are used to compute segment tissue viscoelastic properties. The instrument may also be untethered or wireless.