Wearable Device Occlusion Effect Cancellation via Voice Accelerometer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable hearing devices, such as headphones or earbuds, suffer from the occlusion effect, where sound pressure increases inside the ear canal due to body-conducted sound, leading to reduced acoustic transparency, especially in lower frequencies, which existing active noise control systems fail to fully mitigate.

Innovation Solution

A wearable device incorporating a feedforward microphone, a feedback microphone, and a voice accelerometer, with processors that generate an occlusion effect cancellation signal based on an occlusion effect profile, adjusting the signal dynamically using voice accelerometer data to equalize sound pressure levels and provide full transparency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the ear canal is occluded by earbuds to provide noise isolation, then ambient noise is blocked, but sound pressure level increases inside the ear canal causing the occlusion effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveambient noiseVSAvoidocclusion effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by using a feedforward microphone to detect ambient noise before it enters the ear canal, then generating an anti-noise signal through digital signal processing that preemptively cancels out the incoming noise, thereby reducing the occlusion effect while maintaining noise isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback control by using a feedback microphone to continuously monitor the sound pressure level inside the ear canal, then adjusting the anti-noise signal in real-time to maintain optimal cancellation of the occlusion effect while preserving ambient noise blocking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If active noise control is used to cancel ambient noise, then noise isolation is improved, but acoustic transparency is reduced due to the occlusion effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveambient noiseVSAvoidacoustic transparency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by continuously adapting the digital signal processing parameters based on real-time input from the feedforward and feedback microphones, allowing the noise cancellation to dynamically adjust its strength and frequency response to maintain acoustic transparency while blocking harmful ambient noise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by modifying the gain and frequency response of the anti-noise signal generated by the digital signal processor, adjusting these parameters in real-time to optimize both noise isolation and acoustic transparency, preventing the occlusion effect from degrading sound quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the occlusion effect, allowing for enhanced acoustic transparency by equalizing both bone-conducted and ambient sound, providing a natural listening experience similar to not wearing the device.

Implementation Method 1

body-conducted sound that resonates inside the ear canal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBone conduction: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

a voice accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 3

microphone inputs are filtered using a digital signal processing engine that generates sound waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave detection: Sound

Implementation Method 4

active noise control system that generates noise cancellation signals based on microphone inputs. The sound waves are then superimposed with the primary sound wave within a user's ear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActive noise control: Interference

Implementation Method 5

the frequency of the sound is typically seen in the lower frequencies, often below 800 HZ. This effect is commonly known as the Occlusion Effect which is physically caused by sound pressure from body-conducted sound that resonates inside the ear canal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS20240348969A1Devices, Methods, and Systems for Reducing the Occlusion Effect
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20240348969A1 patent drawing
  • US20240348969A1 patent drawing
  • US20240348969A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wearable device includes a feedforward microphone; a feedback microphone; a voice accelerometer; and one or more processors in communication with the feedforward microphone, the feedback microphone, and the voice accelerometer. The one or more processors may be configured to receive an occlusion effect (“OE”) profile associated with increased sound pressure level within an ear canal; determine an OE gain profile based on the OE profile; receive voice accelerometer data; adjust the OE gain profile based on the voice accelerometer data; generate an OE cancellation signal based on the OE gain profile to equalize the OE profile; receive, from the feedforward microphone, first audio content including external audio; receive, from the feedback microphone, second audio content including audio within the ear canal of a user; and adjust, based on the OE cancellation signal and the received first and second audio content, an audio output.