Multi-Frequency Wearable RFID for Hazard Proximity Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing workplace accident prevention systems face challenges in accurately locating operators near hazardous areas with low power consumption, high reactivity, and integration into personal protective equipment, particularly due to the need for multiple directive antennas and high battery consumption in UWB technology.

Innovation Solution

A wearable RFID system using multiple frequency RFID devices with a TAG integrated into garments and accessories, combining low consumption, accurate distance detection, and high reactivity, utilizing a loop antenna and a control unit to calculate distance based on RSSI, and employing multiple transmission antennas for spatial referencing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If RFID devices operate at a single frequency (2.4 GHz), then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of accident prevention is insufficient due to signal interference and penetration issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident prevention reliabilityVSAvoidRFID device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The RFID system is segmented into multiple frequency channels (2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz) to divide the communication task across different frequencies, reducing interference and improving reliability in hazardous environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The RFID devices are designed with multi-functionality to operate at multiple frequency bands, allowing a single device to adapt to different environmental conditions and maintain reliable communication for accident prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the hazardous area boundary is fixed and static, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to dynamic operator movement and changing work conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptability to operator movementVSAvoidboundary management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hazardous area boundary is transformed from a static geometric definition to a dynamic virtual boundary that automatically adjusts based on operator position, RFID tag locations, and real-time detection data, enabling adaptability to changing work conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where operator positions are tracked, boundaries are dynamically recalculated, and alerts are triggered based on real-time proximity detection, allowing the boundary to adapt to dynamic movement patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If only a single alert level is used, then the ease of operation is improved, but the loss of information about gradient proximity and risk level occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity gradient informationVSAvoidalert system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system applies local quality by providing different alert levels (first, second, third alerts) corresponding to different proximity zones and risk gradients, allowing operators to understand their specific risk level rather than receiving a generic warning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses visual color changes in alerts to communicate different proximity levels and risk gradients intuitively, making the graduated alert system easy to interpret while preserving detailed proximity information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides accurate, timely, and energy-efficient detection of operator proximity to hazards, ensuring integration into personal protective gear and reducing complexity and cost.

Implementation Method 1

The system uses the transmission of an activation signal by coded transmitters placed at the areas of interest or hazardous areas. The transmitted activation signal is received by RFID receiver-transmitter devices, TAGs, worn by the operators present in the area of interest

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRFID (Radio Frequency Identification): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP4053745B1Wearable accident prevention system for hazardous area operators based on RFID devices operating at multiple frequencies
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 SALVADOR CLAUDIO
  • EP4053745B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4053745B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4053745B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A system for preventing accidents in industrial areas that house operators moving and working within said area. The system detects the proximity of an operator to an hazardous area and the distance between the operator and the hazardous area. The system uses the transmission of an activation signal by coded transmitters placed at the areas of interest or hazardous areas. The transmitted activation signal is received by RFID receiver-transmitter devices, TAGs, worn by the operators present in the area of interest, which respond on a radio channel that is different with respect to that used for transmitting the activation signal.