Weather-Adaptive Flight Routing for Fuel-Constrained Aerial Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flight path optimization techniques for aerial vehicles often result in extended missions or aborted flights due to insufficient fuel when weather and mission conditions change, as they fail to efficiently utilize solar and thermal conditions for energy conservation and fuel reduction.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that uses machine learning algorithms to predict weather conditions and determine optimized flight routes, incorporating solar and thermal flight segments, while discarding segments that violate fuel constraints and replacing them with alternative routes to minimize fuel consumption and extend flight duration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If traditional flight path optimization techniques are used, then flight routes can be determined, but fuel consumption increases and flight duration is limited due to insufficient consideration of weather conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidflight duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary weather forecasting and flight route optimization before the actual flight. Machine learning models predict weather conditions along potential flight paths in advance, allowing the system to identify and select routes that will minimize fuel consumption and extend flight duration before the vehicle departs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The flight route is made dynamic and adaptable based on predicted weather conditions. The system continuously evaluates multiple potential routes and adjusts the optimal flight path according to forecasted weather patterns, allowing the vehicle to dynamically respond to changing atmospheric conditions during flight planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If solar and thermal flight segments are incorporated, then energy conservation improves, but route determination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conservationVSAvoidroute determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages natural solar and thermal environmental conditions to provide energy benefits to the flying vehicle. By identifying and utilizing solar radiation patterns and thermal updrafts along flight paths, the system enables the vehicle to harness free environmental energy resources, reducing fuel consumption without requiring complex active energy generation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for route optimization by incorporating weather-related variables such as solar irradiance, temperature gradients, and atmospheric conditions. These parameter changes allow the route determination to account for energy conservation opportunities while managing complexity through focused weather parameter analysis rather than comprehensive environmental modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If flight routes are optimized based on predicted weather conditions, then fuel consumption decreases, but the system requires sophisticated weather prediction and route calculation capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical and manual flight planning methods with machine learning-based predictive models. Instead of relying on conventional weather routing techniques or manual analysis, the system uses automated ML algorithms to predict weather conditions and optimize flight routes, reducing the need for complex human-operated systems while achieving superior fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where machine learning models continuously learn from actual flight data and weather outcomes. By comparing predicted weather conditions with actual conditions experienced during flights, the system refines its prediction accuracy over time, improving fuel optimization performance while managing system complexity through adaptive learning rather than static complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11640180B2Systems and methods for flight path optimization
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US11640180B2 patent drawing
  • US11640180B2 patent drawing
  • US11640180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described herein for determining an optimized flight route for an aerial vehicle. In some examples, weather conditions for the aerial vehicle during a flight can be predicted based on weather data. At least two flight route segments based on the predicted weather data can be determined. The at least two flight route segments can include one of a solar flight route segment and a thermal flight route segment. A respective flight route segment of the at least two flight route segments can be discarded that can cause the aerial vehicle to violate a flight constraint. A replacement flight route segment for the respective discarded flight route segment can be determined. An optimized flight route for the aerial vehicle can be generated based on the replacement flight route segment and at least one remaining flight route segment of the at least two flight route segments.