Weaving Gripper Fork Element With Split Bearing Seats for Lower Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fork-elements for gripper drive systems in weaving machines are heavy due to additional mass balancing elements, which affect their strength and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A fork-element design with a separately fastened second bearing seat positioned closer to the coupling element, reducing the need for additional mass balancing elements, and incorporating a hollow main body with recesses for weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If additional mass balancing elements are added to the fork-element, then the strength and stability are improved, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of fork-elementVSAvoidweight of fork-element
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing seat is divided into two separate bearing seats (first bearing seat and second bearing seat) positioned at different locations on the fork-element. This segmentation allows each bearing seat to independently support loads, reducing the need for additional mass balancing elements while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second bearing seat is positioned closer to the coupling element in the radial direction, creating a three-dimensional distribution of bearing seats. This spatial arrangement optimizes the moment of inertia and weight distribution without requiring additional mass balancing elements, thereby reducing overall weight while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of moving object

If the second bearing seat is positioned closer to the coupling element, then the weight is reduced by eliminating mass balancing elements, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of fork-elementVSAvoidstructural complexity of fork-element
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing seat is segmented into two separate bearing seats that can be independently designed and positioned. This segmentation simplifies the overall structure by eliminating the need for complex mass balancing elements, as each bearing seat independently contributes to the moment of inertia and load support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The position of the second bearing seat is optimized to be closer to the coupling element, changing the geometric parameters of the fork-element. This parameter change reduces the moment of inertia and eliminates the need for additional mass balancing elements, thereby reducing weight while maintaining structural integrity through proper geometric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the second bearing seat is formed separately and fastened using fixation elements, then the manufacturing precision and positioning accuracy are improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracy of bearing seatVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity of fork-element
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing seat is manufactured as separate components (first bearing seat and second bearing seat) that are then assembled onto the fork-element using fixation elements. This segmentation allows each bearing seat to be manufactured with high precision independently, ensuring accurate positioning while simplifying the overall manufacturing process through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing seats are pre-manufactured with precise geometries and then assembled onto the fork-element using fixation elements. This preliminary manufacturing of separate components allows for higher precision in bearing seat fabrication, as each component can be manufactured and inspected independently before final assembly, thereby improving positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4372135B1Fork-element for a gripper drive system for a weaving machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.15 PICANOL NV
  • EP4372135B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4372135B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4372135B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a fork-element for a gripper drive system (1) for a weaving machine comprising a first bearing seat (10), a second bearing seat (11), and a main body (12) with a coupling element (13) configured for coupling the fork-element (5) to a crank (4) of the gripper drive system (1), wherein the second bearing seat (11) is positioned closer to the coupling element (13) than the first bearing seat (10), and wherein the first bearing seat (10) is formed integrally with the main body (12) and the second bearing seat (11) is formed separately and can be fastened to the main body (12) using fixation elements (14). The invention further relates to a to a fork-element system (50), and to a gripper drive system comprising a fork-element and/or a fork-element system (1).