Enterprise Web Application Security via Behavioral Profiling
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Web applications are vulnerable to various attacks due to their unique nature, which traditional network security measures cannot effectively protect, and existing application protection solutions are inadequate in providing tailored and automated security profiles, leading to increased risks of data breaches and compliance issues.
Innovation Solution
A behavioral-based security model with collaborative detection modules and a centralized security manager that monitors network traffic, identifies anomalies, and coordinates responses across an enterprise to prevent attacks, using dynamic profiling and automated threat analysis to create tailored security profiles for each Web application.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional network security measures are used, then general network protection is provided, but Web application-specific security threats cannot be effectively protected
Solution Approach 1:
The security system is segmented into multiple independent components: distributed detection modules deployed at individual network locations, a centralized security manager, and application-specific security profiles. Each component operates independently but contributes to the overall security function, allowing the system to address both general network protection and application-specific threats effectively.
Solution Approach 2:
The system creates customized security profiles for each Web application based on local characteristics and requirements. Each application receives tailored security rules and detection parameters specific to its functionality, rather than applying uniform security measures across all applications. This enables effective protection adapted to each application's unique threat landscape.
2Reliability
If manual security profile creation is used, then customized security protection is achieved, but manual overhead and complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system automatically generates security profiles by analyzing application behavior patterns and traffic characteristics. The centralized security manager autonomously creates, updates, and distributes security rules without requiring manual intervention from security administrators. This self-service capability maintains high security profile accuracy while eliminating manual overhead and reducing operational complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary analysis of application traffic patterns and behavior during normal operation to pre-generate security profiles before threats occur. By continuously monitoring and learning application characteristics in advance, the system prepares security rules proactively, reducing the need for reactive manual configuration and simplifying security management.
3Reliability
If centralized security management is implemented, then enterprise-wide threat coordination is achieved, but impact on network operations increases
Solution Approach 1:
The centralized security manager acts as an intermediary that coordinates security responses across the enterprise without directly interfering with network operations. It receives security events from distributed detection modules, processes them centrally, and sends coordinated response instructions back to the appropriate modules. This intermediary role enables enterprise-wide threat coordination while minimizing impact on network productivity through efficient, non-intrusive communication protocols.
Data Source
AI summary
A system and method for protection of Web based applications are described. The techniques described provide an enterprise wide approach to preventing attacks of Web based applications. Individual computer networks within the enterprise monitor network traffic to identify anomalous traffic. The anomalous traffic can be identified by comparing the traffic to a profile of acceptable user traffic when interacting with the application. The anomalous traffic, or security events, identified at the individual computer networks are communicated to a central security manager. The central security manager correlates the security events at the individual computer networks to determine if there is an enterprise wide security threat. The central security manager can then communicate instructions to the individual computer networks so as to provide an enterprise wide solution to the threat.