Web Defect Detection Using Roll-Synchronized Repeat Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional web inspection systems struggle to accurately identify the source of repeating anomalies in moving webs, particularly when rolls with similar diameters are used, and fail to account for spatial distortion or undocumented roll changes, leading to difficulties in defect detection and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

An automated inspection system that uses optical acquisition devices and sophisticated algorithms to differentiate between repeating and random anomalies, correlating anomaly positions with roll synchronization signals to identify the source of repeating defects, and applies application-specific defect detection recipes based on product selection parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional web inspection systems are used to identify repeating defects, then defect detection capability is provided, but accuracy in identifying the source roll deteriorates when rolls have similar diameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect source identification accuracyVSAvoidhandling of similar roll diameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements of actual roll diameters and circumferences before defect analysis, storing this information for subsequent correlation with repeating defect patterns. This preliminary action enables accurate source identification even when rolls have nominally identical dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical assumption-based identification (assuming all rolls of nominal size X are identical) with optical/electronic measurement and computational correlation. Roll synchronization signals and actual dimensional measurements substitute for mechanical estimation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional inspection systems assume fixed roll diameters, then system simplicity is maintained, but reliability deteriorates when undocumented roll changes occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection reliabilityVSAvoidroll parameter tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors roll synchronization signals and compares actual defect repeat distances with expected values based on recorded roll circumferences. When discrepancies are detected, the system can identify that a roll change has occurred and adjust accordingly, providing feedback that maintains reliability despite roll substitutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system automatically tracks and records roll parameters and synchronizes with roll positions without requiring external documentation or manual input. The system self-updates its understanding of roll characteristics through synchronization signals, eliminating the need for external parameter tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If conventional systems ignore spatial distortion, then processing complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect position accuracyVSAvoidspatial distortion compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of spatial distortion in the web path before defect analysis. By measuring and storing distortion parameters in advance, the system can compensate for spatial variations when correlating defect positions with roll positions, improving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive defect analysis is performed at high web speed, then productivity is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to reduced analysis time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect classification accuracyVSAvoidweb inspection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect detection and classification during high-speed web traversal, capturing essential anomaly information in real-time. More sophisticated analysis, including application-specific defect detection recipes, is then performed offline or at reduced speed, allowing comprehensive analysis without compromising production throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8935104B2Application-specific repeat defect detection in web manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2015.01.13 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US8935104B2 patent drawing
  • US8935104B2 patent drawing
  • US8935104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for inspecting a web and controlling subsequent conversion of the web into one or more products. A system, for example, comprises an imaging device, an analysis computer and a conversion control system. The imaging device images the web to provide digital information. The analysis computer processes the digital information to identify regions on the web containing anomalies. The conversion control system subsequently analyzes the digital information to determine which anomalies represent actual defects for a plurality of different products. The web inspection system may preferentially apply different application-specific defect detection recipes depending on whether a given anomaly is a repeating or random anomaly.