Automated Web Service Instance Placement and Capacity Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual determination of web service instance placement and capacity in large-scale distributed systems is time-consuming, prone to errors, and does not dynamically adapt to changes, leading to suboptimal quality of service and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for managing the number, placement, and capacity of web service instances based on user requests, historical traffic data, and service load capacity, using a scoring system to optimize instance placement and resource allocation across multiple datacenters, ensuring redundancy and minimizing latency and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual determination of web service instance placement and capacity is used, then planning and system administration work can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and does not dynamically adapt to changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of instance placement and capacity managementVSAvoidtime required for manual planning and system administration
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining the number, placement, and capacity of web service instances without requiring manual planning or system administration. The automated system analyzes traffic patterns, service dependencies, and datacenter capacities to autonomously make placement decisions, eliminating the time-consuming manual processes while adapting dynamically to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by continuously monitoring and adapting instance placement and capacity based on real-time changes in user traffic patterns, service dependencies, and datacenter conditions. Rather than static manual planning, the automated system dynamically adjusts资源配置 to match current and predicted future demands, ensuring optimal performance without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple instances of web service are created in multiple datacenters, then quality of service and availability are improved, but the complexity of determining number, placement, and capacity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of service and availabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of instance placement determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to continuously monitor service performance, traffic patterns, and datacenter conditions, then automatically adjusts instance placement and capacity decisions. This closed-loop approach simplifies the complexity by using real-time data to inform automated decisions, ensuring high availability through multiple distributed instances while eliminating the need for complex manual planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple web service instances across different datacenters based on predicted traffic patterns and service dependencies. This advance preparation ensures that instances are already in place and ready to handle requests, improving reliability and availability while the automated system manages the complexity of placement decisions beforehand rather than in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If manual planning is used for web service instance placement, then constraints can be considered, but the process is prone to errors and does not adapt to changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of constraint considerationVSAvoidability to adapt to changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs self-service by automatically analyzing and considering all placement constraints such as datacenter capacities, service dependencies, and traffic patterns without human intervention. This eliminates errors associated with manual planning while continuously adapting to changes in the system environment, maintaining precision in constraint satisfaction through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If more web service instances are deployed, then user access and redundancy are improved, but costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundancy and availabilityVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by deploying the minimum necessary number of web service instances required to meet availability and redundancy requirements, rather than over-provisioning. The automated system calculates optimal instance counts based on actual traffic patterns and service dependencies, ensuring sufficient redundancy while minimizing operational costs by avoiding excessive resource allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12058056B1Method for automatic management of capacity and placement for global services
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12058056B1 patent drawing
  • US12058056B1 patent drawing
  • US12058056B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing web service instances to support traffic demands for a particular web service in a large-scale distributed system are disclosed. An example method includes determining a peak historical service load for the web service. The service load capacity for each existing web service instance may then be determined. The example method may then calculate the remaining service load after subtracting the sum of the service load capacity of the existing web service instances from the peak historical service load for the web service. The number of web service instances necessary in the large-scale distributed system may be determined based on the remaining service load. The locations of the web service instances may be determined and changes may be applied to the large-scale system based on the number of web service instances necessary in the large-scale distributed system.