Food Packaging Web Tension Control Using Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food packaging systems face challenges in maintaining optimal web tension due to complex interactions between sub-systems, requiring manual tuning of PID controllers and failing to adapt to unforeseen conditions, leading to inefficiencies and package defects.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that uses reinforcement learning, particularly deep reinforcement learning with neural networks, to integrate local and remote sub-system measurements for precise web tension control, adjusting the position of a movable guide roll based on combined input from various factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If PID controllers are used for web tensioning control, then local control stability is improved, but adaptability to unforeseen conditions and system-wide optimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweb tension stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to unforeseen conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback control system using sensors to continuously monitor web tension and feed this information back to the controller. The controller adjusts the guide roll position based on the feedback signal to maintain optimal tension, enabling the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-tuning capability where the controller automatically adjusts PID parameters based on real-time system response without requiring manual intervention. This enables the system to adapt to unforeseen conditions and optimize performance autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual tuning of PID controllers is performed, then control precision for specific working range is improved, but setup time and operational complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically tunes PID controller parameters through self-diagnosis and adaptive algorithms, eliminating the need for manual tuning by operators. The controller learns optimal parameters through continuous monitoring and adjustment, reducing setup time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes controller parameters based on real-time operating conditions using adaptive control algorithms. This allows the controller to optimize performance for different working ranges automatically without requiring manual re-tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If system complexity increases to capture more influencing factors, then control accuracy is improved, but difficulty in managing relationships between factors deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidsystem management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple influencing factors (web tension, jaw system position, filling status, packaging material properties) into a unified control model. The system integrates these diverse parameters through a centralized controller that processes all inputs simultaneously, improving accuracy while managing complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed as a multi-functional platform that handles various influencing factors through a single integrated architecture. The universal controller can process different types of inputs (sensors, actuators, process parameters) through standardized interfaces, reducing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning model is implemented, then adaptability and system-wide optimization are improved, but computational requirements and model training complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning model is pre-trained offline using simulated data and historical operational data before deployment. This preliminary training phase allows the system to learn optimal control strategies in advance, reducing the complexity of real-time decision-making during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a digital twin or simulated environment to train the reinforcement learning model, creating a virtual copy of the physical system. This allows extensive training and optimization without affecting the actual packaging operation, reducing training complexity and risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12420968B2Performing web tensioning adjustments in a food packaging system based on reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA
  • US12420968B2 patent drawing
  • US12420968B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus, including computer program products, are described for controlling web tensioning in a food packaging machine comprising a plurality of sub-systems. One or more local variable value are received, which indicate measurements by the food packaging machine of one or more physical parameters for a web tensioning sub-system. One or more remote variable values are received, which indicate measurements by the food packaging machine of one or more physical parameters for one or remote sub-systems. One or more control parameter values are determined for the web tensioning sub-system, by processing the remote and the local variable values using a reinforcement learning model and a local control model. One or more control parameters of the web tensioning sub-system are adjusted in accordance with the determined control parameter values.