Webbing Retractor Moving Member with Varying Cross-Section

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing webbing retractors face resistance issues during the movement of their components, which affects the efficiency of the seatbelt's take-up mechanism.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a moving member with a pierced portion and a rotating member featuring bite-in portions, where the pierced portion's axial direction distal end side has a smaller sectional surface area than the proximal end side, and a narrow portion at the distal end to reduce collision load and enhance movement efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the moving member has a uniform cross-sectional area, then the structural strength is maintained, but the resistance to movement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to movementVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The moving member features a pierced portion with varying cross-sectional area, where the distal end side has a smaller area than the proximal end side. This local variation in geometry reduces resistance to movement in the pierced portion while the larger proximal end portion maintains overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the bite-in portion exerts high force on the moving member, then the take-up performance is improved, but the collision load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetake-up performanceVSAvoidcollision load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The pierced portion's cross-sectional area is changed along its length, with the distal end having a smaller area. This parameter variation allows the bite-in portion to exert sufficient force for effective take-up performance while the gradual area reduction manages the collision load during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces resistance to the movement of the moving member, allowing for smoother rotation of the rotating member and improved take-up performance of the webbing, thereby enhancing the pretensioner's efficiency and reducing operational forces.

Implementation Method 1

the bite-in portion biting thereinto, rotates the rotating member toward the one side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a narrow portion that is provided at an axial direction distal end portion of the moving member, and whose sectional surface area, in a direction orthogonal to an axis, is made to be small as compared with an axial direction proximal end side portion of the moving member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS11007975B2Webbing retractor
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 KK TOKAI RIKA DENKI SEISAKUSHO
  • US11007975B2 patent drawing
  • US11007975B2 patent drawing
  • US11007975B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a webbing retractor, due to a moving member being moved toward an axial direction distal end side, and first teeth and second teeth of a rotating member piercing the moving member, the rotating member is rotated in a take-up direction. Here, at the moving member, a sectional surface area, in a direction orthogonal to an axis, of a small diameter portion that is at an axial direction distal end side is made to be small as compared with a moving member main body that is at an axial direction proximal end side. Therefore, resistance to movement of the moving member can be reduced.