Webpage Optimization via Browser Snippet A/B Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current webpage design methods rely on trial and error, making it challenging to effectively test and optimize webpages, as changes can lead to poor redesigns and it's difficult to discern the impact of redesigns on metrics due to unrelated changes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that uses experiments to compare viewer responses to original and variant webpages by adding a snippet of code to the webpage, allowing for modifications to be tested and tracked, using a browser-based editor application to create and manage variants, and aggregating tracking results to determine improvements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If trial and error method is used for webpage design, then webpages can be created and published quickly, but it is difficult to effectively test and optimize webpages and discern the impact of redesigns on metrics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewebpage creation speedVSAvoidimpact measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the webpage into multiple variants (original and modified versions) and tests them separately through A/B testing. By dividing the testing process into distinct segments with controlled variables, the system can accurately measure the impact of specific redesign elements on user behavior and metrics, resolving the contradiction between quick creation and precise measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where user interactions with different webpage variants are tracked and analyzed. This feedback loop provides quantitative data on the impact of redesigns, enabling precise measurement of metric changes while maintaining rapid iteration capabilities through automated testing and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If trial and error redesign is implemented, then webpage optimization can be pursued, but poorly designed webpages may be made worse through redesign

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewebpage performanceVSAvoidredesign harm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting A/B tests before fully implementing redesigns. By testing variants in advance and comparing their performance, the system identifies effective changes before full deployment, preventing harmful redesigns from being implemented and ensuring only proven improvements are applied to the main webpage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by using control groups (original webpage variants) to counterbalance potential negative effects of redesigns. By maintaining parallel versions and comparing outcomes, the system can detect and prevent harmful changes before they significantly impact overall webpage performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Loss of information

If traditional metrics observation is used, then webpage performance can be monitored, but the respective weights of different factors cannot be discerned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetrics informationVSAvoidfactor weight discrimination
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by systematically varying specific webpage elements across different variants while keeping other factors constant. This controlled parameter manipulation, combined with statistical analysis of user responses, enables the system to determine the relative weights of different factors by observing their individual impacts on metrics, thus resolving the difficulty of factor weight discrimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10902196B1Systems and methods for website optimization
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 OPTIMIZELY NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US10902196B1 patent drawing
  • US10902196B1 patent drawing
  • US10902196B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Webpages are optimizing through the use of experiments that compare the responses of viewers that are either presented with the original webpage or a variant thereof. One or more variants are first defined through the use of a browser-based editor application that initially examines the webpage for a snippet of code. The snippet can be added to the webpage, if missing, and the webpage returned to the editor application. Changes made to the webpage to define a variant are saved in variation code. When the webpage is later requested by multiple viewers, in each instance the viewer receives the webpage with the snippet, the snippet instructs the browser to download a file, and the instructions of the file determine whether the viewer will see the variant or the original webpage. Tracking viewer responses to the webpage and the variant allow a statistical basis for comparison to be developed.