Wedge Blade Scratch Testing for Coating Adhesion Without Substrate Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for measuring the adhesion of ductile metallic coatings on brittle substrates, particularly in multilayer systems, are inadequate due to the risk of substrate damage and lack of resolution, as conventional tests like the 90° peel test and nanoscratch methods fail to provide accurate insights into interfacial failure without requiring special sample preparation.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a wedge blade indenter with a small radius and precise alignment capabilities, allowing for preliminary and main scratch tests to determine the adhesion of ductile metallic coatings on brittle substrates by tilting the sample to ensure perpendicularity, enabling accurate delamination analysis without damaging the substrate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional nanoscratch method using sphero-conical indenters is used, then the adhesion of hard thin films can be characterized, but the substrate is damaged without achieving delamination of the coating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion measurementVSAvoidsubstrate damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the indenter from sphero-conical to wedge-shaped with a small apex angle (20-40 degrees). This parameter change allows the indenter to concentrate stress at the tip for effective delamination while maintaining controlled stress distribution along the scratch path, preventing substrate damage that occurs with conventional indenters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The wedge-shaped indenter creates a segmented stress distribution along the scratch path, with maximum stress concentrated at the apex for initiating delamination and progressively decreasing stress behind the tip. This segmentation allows delamination to occur at the coating-substrate interface without propagating damage into the substrate bulk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If a wedge-shaped indenter with large lateral width (20 μm) is used, then the film can be separated from the substrate, but the resolution is insufficient for investigating ultra-thin metallic coatings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelamination capabilityVSAvoidresolution for ultra-thin coatings
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the dimensional parameters of the wedge-shaped indenter by reducing the lateral width from conventional 20 μm to a much smaller dimension (apex dimensions in the range of 1-10 μm). This parameter change enables resolution of ultra-thin metallic coatings (10-200 nm) while maintaining the wedge geometry necessary for effective delamination through stress concentration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If ultra-precise adjustment of the cutting edge of the wedge is required, then the indenter can function properly, but the adjustment is difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindenter alignmentVSAvoidindenter preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a wedge-shaped indenter with an asymmetric geometry where the apex angle (20-40 degrees) is specifically optimized. This asymmetric design concentrates the critical stress function at the apex region, making the indenter less sensitive to minor variations in cutting edge precision while maintaining effective delamination capability, thus reducing manufacturing difficulty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Force

If a 90° peel test is used to measure adhesion, then the maximum force per width can be determined, but the method lacks resolution for multilayer systems and risks substrate damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion force measurementVSAvoidresolution for individual layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical 90° peel test system with a scratch test system using a wedge-shaped indenter. This substitution transitions from a bulk peeling mechanism to a localized scratch-induced delamination mechanism, enabling resolution of individual layer adhesion in multilayer systems through controlled stress application at the scratch front while avoiding the substrate damage risks of peel tests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4650748A1Method of carrying out a scratch test
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 ANTON PAAR TRITEC SA
  • EP4650748A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4650748A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4650748A1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4c

AI summary

Method of carrying out a scratch test on a ductile metallic coating (7b) provided on a brittle substrate (7a) of a sample (7), said comprising the steps of: - positioning a sample (7) on a sample stage (5) facing a wedge blade indenter (9) having a length dimension (L) perpendicular to an indentation axis (Z) which is less than a width of said ductile metallic coating (7b) considered perpendicular to a scratch direction (X), wherein said sample stage (5) is arranged to tilt about two mutually perpendicular axes of rotation which are each substantially perpendicular to said indentation axis (X), and wherein said ductile metallic coating (7b) is positioned so as to be substantially perpendicular to said indentation axis (Z); - carrying out a preliminary scratch test on said sample (7) with said wedge blade indenter (9) under a first load applied to said sample parallel to said indentation axis (Z), said preliminary scratch test being carried out by relatively displacing said wedge blade indenter (9) with respect to said sample (7) in a scratch direction perpendicular to said length dimension (L) of said wedge blade indenter (9); - observing the scratch thereby produced; - if necessary, correcting the tilt of said sample stage (5) such that said ductile metallic coating (7b) is perpendicular to said indentation axis (Z); - carrying out at least one main scratch test under a second load which is greater than said first load, while recording parameters relating to forces applied between said wedge blade indenter (9) and said sample (7) and to relative displacement of said wedge blade indenter (9) with respect to said sample (7); - observing the scratch thereby produced and correlating said parameters with the observed scratch.