Wedge-Shaped Meniscus Suture Implants for Strain Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suturing devices for meniscal lacerations face issues such as strain on the meniscus due to flat implant shapes, complex assembly, limited thread size, and risk of tissue damage from thin threads and pulley effects, leading to potential further injuries and complications during arthroscopic surgery.

Innovation Solution

A suturing device featuring elongated body with a longitudinal cavity and wedge-shaped implants that eliminate the need for needles, simplify handling, and reduce production costs by using a monolithic design with breakable connections, allowing for direct tissue penetration and uniform strain distribution without knots, thereby enhancing safety and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If flat-shaped implants are used for suturing meniscal lacerations, then the implants can be easily manufactured and inserted, but considerable strain is placed on the perimeter of the implants causing further injuries to the meniscus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstrain on meniscus
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces flat rectangular implants with spherical or rounded implants. The spherical shape distributes strain uniformly across the meniscal tissue rather than concentrating it at the perimeter, eliminating the harmful stress concentration effect while maintaining ease of manufacture through standard spherical component production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Manufacturing precision

If a grooved needle is used to guide the implant, then the implant can be precisely positioned, but the needle takes up preponderant space inside the cannula limiting thread size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidthread size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the grooved needle component from the system entirely. Instead of guiding the implant through a needle, the implant is directly inserted into the cannula or delivered through a simplified delivery mechanism, freeing up space within the cannula to accommodate larger diameter surgical threads for better tissue handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If thin surgical thread is used to accommodate the needle space, then the device can be compact, but the thread increases strain concentration and risks cutting effect during traction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidcutting effect on tissue
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the space constraint that previously forced thin thread usage into a benefit by eliminating the needle entirely. This removes the space occupation, allowing larger diameter threads to be used without increasing device complexity, thereby converting the harmful cutting effect into a beneficial robust tissue handling capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Reliability

If the cannula is introduced to keep implants and thread isolated, then sterility is maintained, but the needle and cannula combination increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesterilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of the needle and cannula into a single integrated delivery system. The implant is delivered through a streamlined mechanism that maintains sterility without requiring separate needle and cannula components, thereby reducing device complexity while preserving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides a high-performance, safe, and reliable suturing solution by reducing tissue strain, simplifying assembly, and minimizing the risk of further injuries through direct tissue penetration and efficient thread management, improving the precision and effectiveness of meniscal laceration repair.

Implementation Method 1

the implants are defined by respective wedge-shaped elements arranged in sequence and extending from an enlarged portion to a tapered portion along said main direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedge: Wedge

Implementation Method 2

the tapered end of the second wedge-shaped element is rigidly connected to the first implant via a respective breakable connection area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS11311283B2Suturing device, in particular for suturing lacerations of the meniscus
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 MEDACTA INT SA
  • US11311283B2 patent drawing
  • US11311283B2 patent drawing
  • US11311283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A suturing device, in particular for suturing lacerations of the meniscus, comprises an elongated body provided with a longitudinal cavity extending along a main direction, at least a first and a second implant slidably inserted in the cavity and arranged in sequence along the main direction and a surgical thread slidably inserted in the cavity and connected to the first and second implant. Such first and second implant comprise, respectively, a first and a second wedge-shaped element arranged in sequence and extending from an enlarged portion to a tapered portion along the main direction.