Deformable Weed Electrode Arrangement for Arc-Safe Contact Electrocution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing weed control methods, particularly chemical herbicides, face inefficiencies, selectivity issues, and safety risks due to voltaic arcs, variability in results, and operator safety concerns in direct contact electrocution methods for weed elimination.

Innovation Solution

An arrangement of electrodes with a deformable frame and insulating elements, allowing for efficient and selective weed electrocution by maintaining consistent contact and minimizing voltaic arcs, featuring a first electrode with a pivoting arm and a second electrode with a curvilinear contact surface, both insulated from the support and generator, and an anti-fire system to prevent ignition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If direct contact electrocution methods are used for weed elimination, then weed control effectiveness is improved, but operator safety deteriorates due to electrical hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidoperator safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode system is divided into multiple independent electrodes (first electrode, second electrode) with separate supports and insulation. This segmentation allows each electrode to be independently controlled and insulated, reducing the risk of uncontrolled electrical discharge while maintaining effective weed elimination capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Insulating elements are introduced as intermediaries between the electrodes and the support structure. These insulating elements prevent unwanted electrical contact and discharge, thereby protecting the operator while allowing the electrodes to maintain effective contact with weeds for electrocution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If rigid electrode structures are used, then structural stability is improved, but adaptability to varying terrain deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to terrain
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode supports are designed to be movable or adjustable rather than fixed rigid structures. This allows the electrodes to adapt their position and contact pressure according to terrain variations, maintaining both structural integrity and adaptability to different ground conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The electrode supports incorporate flexible or deformable elements that can conform to the terrain surface. This flexibility allows the rigid electrode components to maintain stable contact with the ground while adapting to varying topographical conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of manufacture

If electrodes are positioned equidistant from the ground, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but contact effectiveness deteriorates due to inconsistent plant contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcontact effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of fixed equidistant positioning, the electrode supports are designed to dynamically adjust their position relative to the ground. This allows the electrodes to maintain optimal contact with plants regardless of terrain variations, improving contact effectiveness while keeping the manufacturing process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The electrode system incorporates self-adjusting mechanisms that automatically adapt to terrain and plant height variations. This self-service capability ensures consistent contact effectiveness without requiring complex manufacturing or precise initial positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If high voltage electrical pulses are applied, then weed elimination effectiveness is improved, but risk of voltaic arcs and fire increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed elimination effectivenessVSAvoidvoltaic arcs and fire risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Insulating elements serve as intermediaries that control and direct the electrical discharge. These insulators prevent uncontrolled voltaic arcs by providing defined electrical pathways, thereby reducing fire risk while maintaining the high voltage effectiveness needed for weed elimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a controlled electrical environment through proper insulation and electrode positioning that prevents the formation of explosive electrical arcs. This controlled environment allows high voltage application without the harmful side effects of uncontrolled discharge and fire risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the efficiency and safety of weed electrocution by ensuring consistent contact, reducing voltaic arcs, improving selectivity, and protecting the operator from electrical hazards, while adapting to varying terrain conditions.

Implementation Method 1

an arrangement of electrodes for eliminating weeds by contact electrocution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrocution: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 2

a deformable frame (3), wherein said first electrode support (8) is associated with said general support (1) by a first connection means (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

both insulated from the support and generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical insulation: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS11963472B2Electrode arrangement for eliminating weeds by contact electrocution
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 AGRITECH SA
  • US11963472B2 patent drawing
  • US11963472B2 patent drawing
  • US11963472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement of electrodes for removing weeds by contact electrocution comprising: —a general support (1) formed by a first connection means (2) associated with the proximal end of a deformable frame (3), and a first mounting means (5); —a first electrode support (8) associated with said general support (1) by said first connection means (2); —a second electrode support (22) associated with said general support (1) by the distal end (4) of said deformable frame (3); wherein said first electrode support (8) includes a first electrode (15); and wherein said second electrode support (22) includes at least one electrode (29).