Real-Time Weed Identification System Using Depth and Spectral Vision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current weed control systems lack the ability to distinguish between crop plants and weed plants in real-time, leading to inefficient herbicide application and the development of herbicide-resistant weeds due to broadcast spraying methods.

Innovation Solution

A real-time object identification system that utilizes a central controller with a vision system capturing depth and spectral data, a segmentation module to identify objects, and a spraying system that selectively applies pesticides based on plant classification, enabling precise targeting of weeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If broadcast spraying method is used to apply herbicide, then weed control coverage is improved, but herbicide resistance development and chemical use increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control coverageVSAvoidherbicide resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from uniform broadcast spraying to localized spot spraying by applying herbicide only to specific weed locations identified by the vision system. Each spray nozzle operates independently based on real-time plant classification, delivering localized treatment rather than area-wide application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by using onboard vision sensors and processing units to autonomously identify weeds and trigger spray nozzles without human intervention. The controller automatically processes image data, classifies plants, and activates spraying based on predetermined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If broadcast spraying method is used to apply herbicide, then weed control coverage is improved, but chemical use increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control coverageVSAvoidchemical use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies herbicide locally only to weed locations rather than broadcasting across the entire field. This localized application significantly reduces the total volume of chemical used while maintaining effective weed control at targeted sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by applying herbicide to only the necessary portions of the field where weeds are present, rather than excessive full-field coverage. This reduces chemical application to the minimum required effective dose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of substance

If spot spraying technology is used to reduce chemical use, then chemical application precision is improved, but plant identification capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical application precisionVSAvoidplant identification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from two-dimensional color-based plant recognition to three-dimensional depth-based identification using time-of-flight sensors. This additional dimensional data enables accurate differentiation between crops and weeds based on height and spatial position, overcoming the limitations of color-only analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The vision system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it captures depth information, identifies plant species, determines plant position, and triggers spray activation. This multi-functional approach consolidates several operations into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If real-time plant identification is implemented, then selective treatment capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective treatment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of weed control into distinct functional modules: vision data acquisition, image processing, plant classification, and spray control. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that bridges the vision system and spray nozzles. It processes image data, makes classification decisions, and translates these into spray commands, simplifying the interaction between sensing and actuation subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10405535B2Methods, systems and devices relating to real-time object identification
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 DEERE & CO
  • US10405535B2 patent drawing
  • US10405535B2 patent drawing
  • US10405535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The various embodiments disclosed herein relate to identification of one or more specific objects among several other objects. Certain exemplary implementations relate to systems, methods, and devices for identification of one or more specific plant species among several different plants, especially real-time identification of weed plant species in a real-world environment such as a crop field. Other embodiments relate to identification systems, methods, or devices in combination with action components, such as a spraying system for spraying the weed plants identified in real time.