Weighted Spectral Flame Detection for False Source Discrimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flame detection systems struggle to differentiate between actual flames and false flame sources such as arc welding, halogen lights, or heaters, leading to false alarms.

Innovation Solution

A flame detection system utilizing a combination of image capturing units and flame detectors that capture multiple spectral band data, including infrared and ultraviolet bands, with a processor to classify images and assign weights to spectral band data, determining the presence of flames by comparing weighted counts to threshold values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing flame detection systems use simple detection methods, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of flame detection deteriorates due to false alarms from friendly flames and false flame sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent detection channels (UV channel, IR channel, visible light channel) that operate in parallel. Each channel detects different spectral characteristics of flames, and the final determination is made by综合分析 the results from all channels. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high reliability while keeping each individual detection module relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system uses a single imaging device that can detect multiple types of radiation (UV, IR, and visible light) by incorporating different spectral filters. This multi-functional approach allows one device to perform what would otherwise require multiple separate detectors, reducing overall system complexity while improving reliability through multi-spectral analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If the system captures multiple spectral band data to improve detection accuracy, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity and data processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame detection precisionVSAvoidspectral detection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the detection process by first capturing a preliminary image to analyze the field of view for presence of friendly flames or false flame sources. Based on this dynamic assessment, the system then decides whether to proceed with full multi-spectral flame detection or to suppress alerts. This dynamic approach optimizes measurement precision while avoiding unnecessary complex processing in situations where false alarms are likely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system suppresses alerts in presence of friendly flames or false flame sources, then the reliability improves by reducing false alarms, but the response time to actual flames may be delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidflame detection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the field of view before making final flame detection determinations. By first identifying the presence of friendly flames or false flame sources in the scene, the system can pre-adjust its detection sensitivity and alert suppression strategy. This preliminary action allows the system to maintain fast response to actual flames while reducing false alarms, as the preliminary analysis is performed continuously in the background without waiting for separate detection events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively distinguishes between real flames and false sources, reducing false alarms by accurately identifying flames through a weighted count analysis.

Implementation Method 1

at least one image capturing unit to capture one or more images of a field of view (FOV)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection: Light

Implementation Method 2

at least one flame detector configured to capture a first set of spectral band data and a second set of spectral band data present in the FOV

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 3

the at least one flame detector corresponds to a combination of an infrared (IR) sensor and an ultraviolet (UV) sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltraviolet radiation detection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS20260024426A1Flame detection system
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 LIFE SAFETY DISTRIBUTION
  • US20260024426A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024426A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024426A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flame detection system comprises an image capturing unit configured to capture images of a field of view (FOV), a flame detector configured to capture a first set of spectral band data and a second set of spectral band data, and a processor configured to classify the one or more images and first set of spectral band data, assign a weight to each second set of spectral band data, receive a flame count for each second set of spectral band data, determine a weighted count for each flame count, determine a quantity of weighted counts exceeding its respective threshold value, and determine that a flame exists within the FOV when the quantity is greater than or equal to a quantity threshold value, and determine that a flame does not exist within the FOV when the quantity is less than the quantity threshold value.