Weighted Formal Concept Analysis for Intent-Based Summarization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current content summarization methods are inefficient and lack scalability, as they rely on manual processes and fail to accurately represent user intent, often missing important content and being time-consuming and expensive.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing weighted Formal Concept Analysis (wFCA) to identify keywords, disambiguate ambiguous terms, and generate summaries by creating a lattice of concepts and categories, assigning weights to sentences based on keyword associations, and expanding summaries for better understanding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual summarization is performed by users, then the summary quality can be maintained, but it is time consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary qualityVSAvoidtime consuming
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic summarization where the computer system itself performs the summarization task without human intervention. The processor automatically identifies keywords, generates lattices, computes scores, and produces summaries, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating the need for manual user summarization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of human summarization with an automated computational system. The mechanical action of reading and writing summaries by humans is substituted with electronic processing, algorithmic analysis, and automated text generation, significantly reducing time while maintaining quality through structured methodologies like wFCA.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If traditional lexical chaining approach is used for summarization, then the process is simple, but it misses out on important content related to user intent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidimportant content
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the summarization approach by introducing weighted Formal Concept Analysis instead of simple lexical chaining. It incorporates user intent as a new parameter, uses weighted scoring mechanisms, and applies lattice-based concept hierarchies to transform how content is selected and organized, ensuring important information is captured while maintaining systematic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of Formal Concept Analysis lattices that mediate between the raw content and the final summary. This intermediary structure organizes concepts and relationships, allowing the system to capture important content related to user intent while maintaining a structured, manageable process that bridges simplicity and comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual summarization is performed, then accuracy can be maintained, but it is not scalable for a large number of documents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary accuracyVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs summarization independently without requiring human resources, enabling it to handle large volumes of documents simultaneously. The processor-based architecture allows parallel processing and scaling to accommodate increasing document quantities while maintaining consistent accuracy through standardized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual summarization mechanics with automated computational processes that can be scaled indefinitely. The electronic system processes documents through standardized pipelines involving keyword identification, lattice generation, and score computation, enabling high-productivity summarization of large document collections while preserving accuracy through consistent algorithmic application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If lexical chaining is used to represent content, then the method is straightforward, but it fails to elaborate content in an easily understood manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod simplicityVSAvoidunderstandability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the summarization process into distinct, manageable stages: keyword identification, lattice generation, score computation, and summary assembly. Each stage handles a specific aspect of the task, making the overall complex process easier to understand and operate. The segmentation also allows for better control and explanation of how content is selected and presented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The Formal Concept Analysis lattice serves as an intermediary structure that organizes concepts and relationships in a visually and logically comprehensible manner. This intermediary representation makes the complex relationships in the content easier to understand, showing how concepts connect and hierarchically organize information, thereby improving ease of operation and understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9037590B2Advanced summarization based on intents
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 FORMCEPT TECH & SOLUTIONS PVT
  • US9037590B2 patent drawing
  • US9037590B2 patent drawing
  • US9037590B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for summarizing content using weighted Formal Concept Analysis (wFCA) is provided. The method includes (i) identifying, by a processor, one or more keywords in the content based on parts of speech, (ii) disambiguating, by the processor, at least one ambiguous keyword from the one or more keywords using the wFCA, (iii) identifying, by the processor, an association between the one or more keywords and at least one sentence in the content, and (iv) generating, by the processor, a summary of the content based on the association.