Weighted Exercise Garment with Proportional Mass Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wearable weighted devices for muscle training are not configured for effective muscle performance enhancement and can lead to injuries due to improper configuration or use.

Innovation Solution

A weighted garment with a material that conforms to the body, featuring a predetermined weight distribution based on the wearer's body mass distribution, with weights placed in specific regions to optimize muscle performance, strength, and stamina enhancement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If weights are added to a garment for muscle training, then muscle performance enhancement is improved, but the risk of injury increases due to improper weight distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuscle performance enhancementVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by distributing weights to specific body regions (upper body, lower body, core) rather than uniform distribution. Each region receives weights proportional to its mass contribution to total body weight, creating localized weight enhancement that matches anatomical characteristics and reduces injury risk through balanced stress distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of weight distribution from uniform to proportional based on body mass distribution. By calculating and applying different weight amounts to different body regions according to their mass proportions, the system optimizes both training effectiveness and safety margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If weights are distributed uniformly across the garment, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but muscle performance enhancement deteriorates due to improper configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarment configuration simplicityVSAvoidmuscle performance enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by placing weights in specific anatomical regions rather than uniform distribution. This requires manufacturing complexity to achieve proper weight placement in upper body, lower body, and core regions, but significantly improves muscle performance enhancement through configuration that matches body mass distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If total weight is increased for better training results, then muscle performance enhancement is improved, but the risk of injury increases due to excessive weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuscle performance enhancementVSAvoidinjury risk from excessive weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by distributing total weight across multiple body regions rather than concentrating it. This allows higher total weights to be used safely by spreading the load proportionally across upper body, lower body, and core regions, reducing peak stress on any single area while maintaining training effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10045572B2Exercise garment with distributed weight and method
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 BRATCHER THOMAS PAUL
  • US10045572B2 patent drawing
  • US10045572B2 patent drawing
  • US10045572B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a weighted exercise garment includes multiple parts. The garment is weighted with weights being distributed about the garment in a predetermined manner.