Sequential Data Classification via Weighted Indicator Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing techniques using Sequential Probability Ratio Test (SPRT) assume equal importance for all elements in sequential data, leading to insufficient accuracy in classification.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that acquires sequential data elements, calculates indicators for class membership, determines weights for each indicator based on their importance, and integrates these weighted indicators to classify the data accurately.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If equal importance is assumed for all elements in sequential data (conventional SPRT), then the method is simple to implement, but classification accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different weights to different elements in the sequential data based on their individual importance or reliability. Each element's contribution to the final classification is localized and differentiated, rather than treating all elements uniformly. This allows the system to focus more on high-quality or critical data points while reducing the influence of less reliable elements, thereby improving overall classification accuracy without requiring complete redesign of the processing framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces weight parameters that modify the contribution of each element in the sequential data. By dynamically adjusting these weight parameters based on element characteristics, the system transforms the fixed equal-weight assumption into a flexible parameter-driven approach. This parameter change enables the methodology to adapt to different data qualities and scenarios, improving accuracy while maintaining a structured processing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If weights are calculated for each indicator based on importance, then classification accuracy improves, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent calculates the weights for all indicators in advance, before the actual sequential classification process begins. This preliminary weighting step allows the system to prepare the importance factors ahead of time, so that during the actual classification of sequential data, the weights can be directly applied without real-time recalculation. This approach separates the complex weight calculation phase from the efficient classification phase, reducing the computational burden during operational use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If all elements are processed with equal weight, then processing is efficient, but important elements may be overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidclassification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies differential weighting to different elements based on their local quality or importance characteristics. High-importance elements receive greater weights, ensuring their information is adequately represented in the final classification, while less critical elements receive lower weights. This localized quality-based approach ensures that processing efficiency is maintained through automated weight application, while reliability is improved by preventing important elements from being overlooked or undervalued.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240265536A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, medical image identification device, and non-transitory computer readable medium storing program
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 NEC CORP
  • US20240265536A1 patent drawing
  • US20240265536A1 patent drawing
  • US20240265536A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one example embodiment, an information processing apparatus includes: an acquisition unit configured to sequentially acquire a plurality of elements included in sequential data; a first calculation unit configured to calculate, based on two or more of the plurality of elements, an indicator indicating which one of a plurality of classes each of the plurality of elements should belong to; a second calculation unit configured to calculate weights showing importance of the respective indicators of the plurality of respective elements; a third calculation unit configured to weight the indicators of the plurality of respective elements by the corresponding weights and integrate the weighted indicators to calculate an integrated indicator indicating which one of the plurality of classes the sequential data should belong to; and a classification unit configured to classify the sequential data into one of the classes based on the integrated indicator.