Weighted Impact Locking Mechanism for Waste Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking devices for waste containers are inadequate in preventing spillage when the container is knocked over, as they either require multiple steps to secure or deteriorate due to environmental exposure, and lack effective mechanisms to differentiate between intentional dumping and unintended tipping.

Innovation Solution

A locking device with a weighted mechanism and impact detection paddles that keeps the lid closed during sudden movements like impacts, but allows opening when the container is tipped forward for dumping, using a dual-button actuation system and a latch mechanism that engages with the container's side walls to prevent spillage while allowing manual or automated dumping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a strap locking mechanism is used, then the lid can be secured to the container, but the locking process requires multiple steps and the strap can easily become separated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelid securing reliabilityVSAvoidlocking operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex multi-step strap locking process and replaces it with a single integrated latch mechanism that automatically engages when the lid is closed, eliminating the need for separate locking steps while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism is designed to automatically engage and lock the lid without requiring manual intervention, making the system self-securing upon closure while the release mechanism provides simple one-handed operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Force

If a metal coil locking device is used, then greater tension can be provided, but the coil deteriorates due to exposure to the elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking tensionVSAvoidlocking device durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters of the locking mechanism from metal coil to a polymer-based latch system with engineered elastic properties, maintaining sufficient locking force while achieving resistance to environmental deterioration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism utilizes composite material properties combining elasticity for engagement force with environmental resistance, replacing the metal coil's tensile strength approach with a more durable polymer-based elastic deformation system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If a locking device is designed to prevent lid opening during impacts, then spillage is prevented, but the lid cannot open during intentional dumping operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespillage preventionVSAvoiddumping operation compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism incorporates dynamic response characteristics where the engagement force adapts based on the magnitude and duration of applied forces, automatically distinguishing between brief impact loads and sustained dumping operations through elastic deformation behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded latch provides preliminary locking action that resists accidental opening forces, while the design inherently allows override when sufficient force is applied in the dumping direction, preventing false locking during normal use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Ease of operation

If a friction-fit lid coupling is used, then the lid can be easily removed, but the lid becomes unsecured and contents can be expelled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelid removal easeVSAvoidlid security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the easy removal feature with automatic security locking by integrating the latch mechanism into the lid closure process itself, where closing the lid simultaneously engages both the friction fit and the positive latch lock in a single operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The locking device effectively prevents spillage during accidental container tilts or impacts while allowing easy manual or automated dumping by distinguishing between intended and unintended tipping, ensuring secure closure and convenient operation without additional devices.

Implementation Method 1

A locking device with a weighted mechanism and impact detection paddles that keeps the lid closed during sudden movements like impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

impact detection paddles that keeps the lid closed during sudden movements like impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentEP3230175B1Locking device for a container and method for making a waste container
Publication Date: 2020.04.29 SERIO US IND
  • EP3230175B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3230175B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3230175B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A locking device for a container is provided. The locking device contains a weighted mechanism (66) having a mounting block (106) and at least one paddle (110) mounted on the mounting block (106). The weighted mechanism (66) is movable between a locked position and an unlocked position. The at least one paddle (110) having two opposing ends. A first end is mounted to the mounting block by a rotatable coupling (120) to allow the paddle to pivot thereon. A second end of the paddle is detachably mounted to a surface of the mounting block (106), such that a sudden jerking or jarring motion, such as by impact with the ground, causes the second end to detach from the mounting block (106) to block the weighted mechanism (66) from moving from the locked position to the opened position.