Weighted Plastic Pipe Hollow Wall Filling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lightweight plastic pipes with hollow profiles require additional weighting for submersion in marine environments, leading to increased costs and potential point loadings, as conventional methods like using cast concrete weights are inefficient and can cause uneven weight distribution and pipe deformation.

Innovation Solution

Filling the hollow walls of plastic pipes with a pumped concrete mix that has a density greater than water, displacing air and providing a controlled, reliable weighting without causing pipe deformation, with a long hardening time to ensure stability and viscoelastic behavior during submersion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional cast concrete weights are used to weight lightweight plastic pipes, then the pipes can be submerged in marine environments, but point loadings occur on the pipes causing potential pipe deformation and breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of pipeVSAvoidpipe strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the weighting function with the pipe structure itself by filling the hollow wall cavity with weighting material. This integration eliminates the need for separate external weights, thereby avoiding point loadings on the pipe while achieving the required submersion weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The weighting material is nested within the hollow wall cavity of the pipe. This nested configuration allows the weighting material to be contained within the existing pipe structure, distributing weight evenly without requiring external attachments that would create point loadings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Stability of the object's composition

If external anchoring weights are used to immobilize pipes at the bottom, then pipe stability is improved, but costs increase and point loadings are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe stabilityVSAvoidpoint loadings
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the weighting and stabilization functions into a single integrated solution. The weighting material filled within the pipe wall provides both the necessary weight for submersion and stable positioning on the bottom, eliminating the need for separate external anchoring weights and their associated point loadings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Weight of moving object

If hollow profiles are used to reduce pipe weight, then buoyancy increases, but additional weighting is required which increases complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe weightVSAvoidweighting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hollow wall cavity serves multiple functions: it provides structural lightweighting for buoyancy, and simultaneously serves as a container for the weighting material. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate weighting components, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining the benefits of hollow profile construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Weight of moving object

If flowing medium is used to fill hollow profiles, then air pockets are displaced and weight is increased, but the medium must have specific properties increasing material selection constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe weightVSAvoidmaterial selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies particular parameter ranges for the weighting material (density of 1100-2500 kg/m³) to achieve optimal performance. By defining these parameter ranges, the invention balances the need for sufficient weight increase with compatibility with common construction materials, maintaining reasonable material selection flexibility while achieving the desired weighting effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides a cost-effective, reliable weighting solution that reduces the need for external anchoring weights, ensures even weight distribution, and maintains pipe flexibility, allowing for efficient submersion and immobilization without risking pipe breakage under loadings.

Implementation Method 1

a pumped, flowing weighting/injection mass which displaces air from the pipe wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDisplacement: Displacement

Implementation Method 2

The pipe is weighted by injecting a pumped, flowing weighting/injection mass... the final weighting percentage for the pipe is between about 1 and 25%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2179206B1Method of weighting plastic pipes
Publication Date: 2014.11.12 OY KWH PIPE AB

AI summary

Method of weighting of a plastic pipe with a hollow, air- filled wall, a weighted lightweight pipe with a hollow wall, and a pipeline formed by a plurality of weighted, lightweight pipes which are welded together. According to the method the hollow wall of the pipe is filled with a flowing medium which displaces air and which increases the weight of the pipe and which thereby facilitates submerging of the pipe. The flowing medium is suitably a concrete mix which has delayed hardening and low long-term strength. The concrete mix gives reliable weighting of the pipe without external point loadings. The binder of the mix prevents segregation of the aggregate and the material thereby becomes evenly distributed inside the wall of the pipe.