Weighted Risk Evaluation Framework for Flight Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex logistical operations such as air-traffic control and flight scheduling face challenges in comprehensive real-time risk evaluation due to numerous and interrelated risks, which are not typically assessed effectively.

Innovation Solution

A risk evaluation framework that evaluates flight risks based on comprehensive and interrelated sets of factors, including proficiency, equipment, environmental, and performance risks, by applying weightings to these factors to generate weighted risk scores and provide actionable recommendations for reducing flight risk levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive risk factors are evaluated for complex logistical operations, then risk assessment accuracy is improved, but evaluation time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment framework divides comprehensive risk factors into multiple categories (proficiency risk, equipment risk, environmental risk, performance risk) with specific weightings. This segmentation allows systematic evaluation of complex risks while managing computational complexity through structured processing of individual risk components rather than treating them as a monolithic assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework applies different weightings to different risk factors based on their relative importance. By adjusting these parameters (weightings) dynamically or statically, the system optimizes the balance between assessment comprehensiveness and evaluation speed, prioritizing high-impact risks while still considering lower-impact factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple interrelated risk factors are considered, then risk evaluation completeness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk evaluation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework segments risk evaluation into distinct modules handling different risk categories (proficiency, equipment, environmental, performance). Each module processes specific risk factors independently before integrating results, which manages system complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation of interrelated risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework creates a universal risk assessment structure that can evaluate multiple types of risks using a consistent methodology. The same weighting and evaluation principles apply across different risk categories, reducing overall system complexity through standardization while maintaining the ability to handle complex, interrelated risk factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If real-time risk evaluation is implemented, then operational responsiveness is improved, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time evaluation speedVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The framework uses configurable weightings that can be optimized for real-time processing. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves real-time risk evaluation speeds appropriate for operational decision-making while managing computational resource consumption through efficient processing of weighted risk factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The framework evaluates only the necessary risk factors and weightings required for each specific operational context rather than processing all possible risks uniformly. This partial action approach enables real-time evaluation by focusing computational resources on relevant risk areas while still providing comprehensive assessment where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12116142B2Risk assessment framework
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
  • US12116142B2 patent drawing
  • US12116142B2 patent drawing
  • US12116142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for receiving data related to a first flight risk factor and a second flight risk factor where the first and second risk factors include one of: a proficiency risk factor, an equipment risk factor, an environmental risk factor, or a performance risk factor. Applying a first weighting to the first flight risk factor to generate a first weighted flight risk factor, and applying a second weighting to the second flight risk factor to generate a second weighted flight risk factor. Assessing a flight risk level for a flight based on the first weighted flight risk factor and the second weighted flight risk factor. Providing data indicating the assessed flight risk level for the flight for display to a user.