Weighted Signal Combining for HARQ Decoding Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, existing retransmission techniques, such as ARQ and HARQ, face challenges in effectively decoding messages due to the unequal reliability of signals received over different channel conditions, leading to inefficiencies in error detection and correction.

Innovation Solution

The proposed technique prioritizes a second signal over one or more first signals in decoding, using error detection information to assign greater significance to the current signal, allowing for non-uniform combining and dual decoding processes to improve decoding success rates, especially in hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If uniform combining of retransmission signals is used, then implementation complexity is reduced, but decoding reliability deteriorates due to unequal signal quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding complexityVSAvoiddecoding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weights to different received signals based on their individual qualities. Specifically, more recent signals are assigned higher weights while older signals receive lower weights, creating a non-uniform weighting scheme that adapts to the varying reliability of each signal transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the combining weights adaptive rather than static. The weights are dynamically adjusted based on signal characteristics such as reception quality metrics and timing information, allowing the system to optimize decoding performance under varying channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If equal weighting of all received signals is used, then processing simplicity is maintained, but decoding success rate decreases due to channel variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoiddecoding success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of signal weighting from uniform to non-uniform. By introducing variable weights that depend on signal quality parameters and reception timing, the system improves decoding success rates while maintaining reasonable processing complexity through efficient weight calculation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If retransmission signals are combined with equal significance, then implementation is simpler, but error correction effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombining complexityVSAvoiderror correction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality in error correction by giving different levels of significance to different retransmission signals. More reliable signals contribute more to the correction process through higher weighting, while less reliable signals contribute less, thereby improving overall error correction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9225477B1Significance of retransmission used in subsequent decoding
Publication Date: 2015.12.29 NXP USA INC
  • US9225477B1 patent drawing
  • US9225477B1 patent drawing
  • US9225477B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques relating to wireless communications are described. A described technique includes receiving, at a wireless communication device, signals representing wireless data transmissions that are based on a message, the received signals including one or more previous signals and a current signal, wherein the current signal was transmitted in response to the one or more previous signals failing to successfully resolve the message; combining the received signals based on unequal weights to produce a combined signal, the weights include a first weight value assigned to the one or more previous signals and a second, greater weight value assigned to the current signal, the second weight value being based on a noise variance, the first weight value being based on a modified version of the noise variance, the modified version reflecting one or more decoding failures; and decoding the combined signal to resolve the message.